Page 21 of 22

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:24 pm
by dan08
Arthur Crabtree wrote:
backfootpunch wrote:
they took ed joyce back


There's a requalification period. And people say Warks said he had to stop playing for Ireland for some reason.

The only reason he quit Ireland was so he could play Tests i think but it looks like he won't add to his lone cap now.

Ireland fast-tracked Joyce back and if Rankin wants to quit England then Ireland will try to fast-track him too.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:27 pm
by dan08
Time for Fred...

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:32 pm
by dan08
Surely not?!

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:34 pm
by st_brendy
Would be the greatest finish to Finals Day for a long time. Maybe even ever.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:35 pm
by st_brendy
st_brendy wrote:Would be the greatest finish to Finals Day for a long time. Maybe even ever.


Even in 2012, it didn't actually go down to the last ball.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:35 pm
by st_brendy
st_brendy wrote:
st_brendy wrote:Would be the greatest finish to Finals Day for a long time. Maybe even ever.


Even in 2012, it didn't actually go down to the last ball.


Actually scratch that. How on earth could I forget 2010. I was there for heaven sake!

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:39 pm
by dan08
Ah well, good effort from Flintoff

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:39 pm
by SaintPowelly
Anderson cost Lancs the trophy. Stick to the players that got you there.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:40 pm
by dan08
Lancs would also have won if the umpires gave Birmingham a 6 run penalty. Don't know why it wasn't awarded as they clearly went over the time limit.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:42 pm
by Making_Splinters
Exceptional final over from Woakes, why can't he bowl like that for England!

Cracking couple of games tonight, well played Bears.

As an aside, we should have won, Birmingham over the time limit, Lancashire win by 1 wicket.

Would rather lose to play on the field though.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:44 pm
by Hampshire
dan08 wrote:Lancs would also have won if the umpires gave Birmingham a 6 run penalty. Don't know why it wasn't awarded as they clearly went over the time limit.


Was it down to 0 before the start of the last over then?

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:46 pm
by st_brendy
Hampshire wrote:
dan08 wrote:Lancs would also have won if the umpires gave Birmingham a 6 run penalty. Don't know why it wasn't awarded as they clearly went over the time limit.


Was it down to 0 before the start of the last over then?


9.32 on the scoreboard was the cut off. I made it 9.33 when the 19th over finished.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:47 pm
by SaintPowelly
Isn't it down to the umpires discretion ??, batsman chatting, asking for gloves etc. all add up.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:51 pm
by captaincolly
SaintPowelly wrote:Isn't it down to the umpires discretion ??, batsman chatting, asking for gloves etc. all add up.

Ironically, Horton's furious reaction & the time it took for him to leave the crease might have cost Lancs-umpires may have taken it into consideration.
Think Warwickshire were fortunate though not to get penalised but they were deserved winners on the day.

Re: NatWest t20 Blast

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:54 pm
by pompeymeowth
That was bloody disgraceful by Horton.

I think the Umps got it right to not add a penalty.