Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

dan08 wrote:Lancs would also have won if the umpires gave Birmingham a 6 run penalty. Don't know why it wasn't awarded as they clearly went over the time limit.

Maybe they reckon Horton wasted a minute complaining.

Woakes > Anderson.

Yes, a fine is surely coming Horton's way, and I wouldn't be surprised if a suspension does to. Even more so considering he was Lancs' captain.

The umpires said they 17 seconds over time but they started the game late so they were content.

The best team on the day won, starting by beating the pundits favourites and holding their nerve when it mattered.

hopeforthebest wrote:The umpires said they 17 seconds over time but they started the game late so they were content.

The best team on the day won, starting by beating the pundits favourites and holding their nerve when it mattered.

Yeah, Warwickshire certainly deserved their victory.

captaincolly wrote:

hopeforthebest wrote:The umpires said they 17 seconds over time but they started the game late so they were content.

The best team on the day won, starting by beating the pundits favourites and holding their nerve when it mattered.

Yeah, Warwickshire certainly deserved their victory.

Or Birmingham.

Aidan11 wrote:

captaincolly wrote:

hopeforthebest wrote:The umpires said they 17 seconds over time but they started the game late so they were content.

The best team on the day won, starting by beating the pundits favourites and holding their nerve when it mattered.

Yeah, Warwickshire certainly deserved their victory.

Or Birmingham.

Well done Birmingham. At least the trophy is staying in the same area. Leics next year?

stunned that warks won it to be honest...Horton's behaviour was disgusting, and he should get some sort of ban for it..