st_brendy wrote:Heck of a chase so far for Kent. And yet they still need ten an over.
dan08 wrote:Now that's what you call a run chase
Durhamfootman wrote:neither of the mercenaries are in the team.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Weird tie between Yorks and Lancs at OT.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Weird tie between Yorks and Lancs at OT.
Durhamfootman wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Weird tie between Yorks and Lancs at OT.
not sure I've ever come across a D/L tie before
st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Weird tie between Yorks and Lancs at OT.
not sure I've ever come across a D/L tie before
2003 World Cup match, when SA thought they had reached the DL winning score and didn't seek a further run, only to discover they had only reached the DL tie score.
st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Weird tie between Yorks and Lancs at OT.
not sure I've ever come across a D/L tie before
2003 World Cup match, when SA thought they had reached the DL winning score and didn't seek a further run, only to discover they had only reached the DL tie score.
Durhamfootman wrote:although now I think about it...that was the WIndies and they lost
The Professor wrote:Off the back of the Lancashire v Yorkshire game I can't help but think that this tournament doesn't need a lot of tinkering to be world class.
Huge crowd.
Top batting.
Great bowling.
Drama.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests