Sums up the poverty of resources


shankycricket wrote:Does say a lot about the progress made in the attack department that guys like Sterling who were central cogs in the World Cup are not even certain of a squad place now. Kane and Vardy is an excellent duo upfront.
Gingerfinch wrote:shankycricket wrote:Does say a lot about the progress made in the attack department that guys like Sterling who were central cogs in the World Cup are not even certain of a squad place now. Kane and Vardy is an excellent duo upfront.
Sterling hasn't done much for England, unlike Welbeck, who despite his faults scored a few in the qualifiers.
sussexpob wrote:Gingerfinch wrote:shankycricket wrote:Does say a lot about the progress made in the attack department that guys like Sterling who were central cogs in the World Cup are not even certain of a squad place now. Kane and Vardy is an excellent duo upfront.
Sterling hasn't done much for England, unlike Welbeck, who despite his faults scored a few in the qualifiers.
Apart from being widely accepted as the best player at England's last world cup, Sterling was also the top English assist maker in qualification.
Hardly nothing for a lad of 19-21 years of age.
sussexpob wrote:As for Shaw, he might be a starter when fit, but to deny Rose a place after an excellent season because you want to play a bloke that wont get 90 minutes in for a whole year before the tournament would be too much of a leap of faith. No point taking Rashford either, too many people above him in the list that he would never get on the field anyway.
England's big question is who to play alongside Eric Dier in the CM position now Henderson has gone.
Gingerfinch wrote: Huh? By you? Not by me he wasn't, or anybody else I know.
Gingerfinch wrote: Barkley?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests