ddb wrote:"Won pretty much everything"
haha, Sky. What a fitting way for him to go.
sussexpob wrote:Well... Gerrard ends the way he has always played.... by not winning anything.
Better than Scholes, no, but who did he keep out of the England team?
sussexpob wrote:Better than Scholes, no, but who did he keep out of the England team?
Paul Scholes
sussexpob wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:sussexpob wrote:How is John Carver still a manager in the Premier League? Surely the ball boys at Newcastle could do a better job? Just sack him for the last match and let the team play on instinct, they would have more of a chance of winning
Erm....don't you listen, hes still a manager because hes the best manager in the league, he told us all this last week in his press conference.
I like Newcastle, but part of me wants them to relegated and lose all that money just out of spite for the fact that idiot of a chairman put the worst manager he could find in charge on the basis that he was costing nothing. How ironic it would be for that decision to cost the club 50 million pounds plus and end in the championship?
Newcastle fans deserve better..... any other clubs fans would have left the stadium empty by 2008
One of England's greats in what at one time was an awesome England team
No he didn't, No midfield player at that time played in their natural position. Lampard, Scholes, Beckham and Gerrard just did not work together and all suffered due to the fact the managers of England could not make a tough decision. But only one player decided to stop representing his country because he got played out of position.
(a performance that has) raised a whole new battalion of critics here. Enjoying a 1-0 lead that had been attained with a balanced approach, the manager sought to retain it by replacing Paul Scholes......... as in the defeat by France, the opposition were offered the initiative and snapped it up.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests