Durhamfootman wrote:sounds as though Havertz is up to his old tricks. Gets away with it again, if the reports are anything to go by
andy wrote:Shocking that VAR didn't intervene!!!!
Durhamfootman wrote:sneaky.....
the EFL have ruled that Boro are not 'an interested party' and so cannot participate in the hearing, meaning that if they don't like the outcome, they have no right of appeal and the case can be closed
For Boro and their fans, this is bound to feel like a stitch up
Durhamfootman wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:sneaky.....
the EFL have ruled that Boro are not 'an interested party' and so cannot participate in the hearing, meaning that if they don't like the outcome, they have no right of appeal and the case can be closed
For Boro and their fans, this is bound to feel like a stitch up
well, well, well
Southampton expelled from the play off and Boro installed as finalists v Hull City on Saturday
I'll be quite honest and say that I didn't think the EFL had the stones to do that
Southampton have the right to appeal, which must be made in time to adjudicate on it tomorrow
turns out they have admitted to three breaches related to spying on the opposition.... Oxford in December, Ipswich in April and then Boro

bigfluffylemon wrote:West ham still have a lifeline, but it's unlikely. Need to beat Leeds, while hoping Everton do then a favour and beat Spurs, with neither Leeds nor Everton having anything but pride to play for.
Gingerfinch wrote:Do Oxford get the points back? This is my issue with this outcome as although Oxford won in December but lost the reverse fixture.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests