Durhamfootman wrote:Second half was brilliant from England. First half they just sat back after the early goal and let Ukraine get back into the game. Ukraine had a few chances in that first half, but it had nothing to do with them and everything to do with England faffing about at the back when they could have been more dynamic... show a bit more intent. It will cost them eventually
I suppose they were trying to control the game, and not use up too much energy on what looked like a really hot evening, but it just gives heart to the other teams who end up believing that they are still in the game.
Second half was much better, so I imagine SG told them to stop faffing about and get out there and win the bloody thing, which ended up only taking 5 minutes once they put their mind to it
Still no goals conceded. Does that happen much with teams that reach the SF's?. Including the 2 warm up matches, that's 7 games now without conceding. The worry is that when they do eventually concede it'll be like Harry Kane ending his goal drought and they then concede another two very quickly
Part in bold seems to be the key to me : they recognize that they can't go at a hundred miles an hour for too long (particularly in the first half) without paying for it later on - as one or two teams seem to have done in this tournament and suffered through late opposition comebacks. So after the early goal they were quite happy to bide their time and have another quick burst after the break. Consistent with their approach in earlier matches too so I reckon it is
Plan A.
Problem might be : fine if you score first - maybe not so good if you were to fall behind.
Denmark game looks a step up. But with the confidence these last two games must have brought the team , and the home advantage , it doesn't look at all insurmountable. Quietly confident...

