alfie wrote:That late strike makes it England's session.
I saw complaints earlier re the Moeen experiment , and was considering replying then. Now he has the wicket , a belated comment :
Yes the experiment of using Moeen early certainly failed . But does that make it a bad idea ? We have often criticized England for being too reluctant to try anything different : the New England clearly is less so ... I wouldn't have made that move myself , as I thought the pace men were looking dangerous and Wood might have taken over immediately. But trying Moeen might have upset Warner... I can't condemn it just because it didn't work. And then , second time around , it did.
You win some - you lose some.
alfie wrote:That late strike makes it England's session.
I saw complaints earlier re the Moeen experiment , and was considering replying then. Now he has the wicket , a belated comment :
Yes the experiment of using Moeen early certainly failed . But does that make it a bad idea ? We have often criticized England for being too reluctant to try anything different : the New England clearly is less so ... I wouldn't have made that move myself , as I thought the pace men were looking dangerous and Wood might have taken over immediately. But trying Moeen might have upset Warner... I can't condemn it just because it didn't work. And then , second time around , it did.
You win some - you lose some.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:alfie wrote:That late strike makes it England's session.
I saw complaints earlier re the Moeen experiment , and was considering replying then. Now he has the wicket , a belated comment :
Yes the experiment of using Moeen early certainly failed . But does that make it a bad idea ? We have often criticized England for being too reluctant to try anything different : the New England clearly is less so ... I wouldn't have made that move myself , as I thought the pace men were looking dangerous and Wood might have taken over immediately. But trying Moeen might have upset Warner... I can't condemn it just because it didn't work. And then , second time around , it did.
You win some - you lose some.
Spot on. I though it was a fair idea.
Some of the field placing has been debatable. Especially in the first twenty overs.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Bang bang bang after lunch.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests