Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

hopeforthebest wrote:I have a soft spot for Watson and his LBW issue which has once again seen his demise today.

They might as well just print lbw next to his name in the score card and leave a blank space to fill in the score & bowler.

hopeforthebest wrote:I have a soft spot for Watson and his LBW issue which has once again seen his demise today.

Surprised he didn't try to review it.

Aidan11 wrote:

hopeforthebest wrote:I have a soft spot for Watson and his LBW issue which has once again seen his demise today.

Surprised he didn't try to review it.

Apparently he left the field with a hanging head.

hopeforthebest wrote:

Aidan11 wrote:

hopeforthebest wrote:I have a soft spot for Watson and his LBW issue which has once again seen his demise today.

Surprised he didn't try to review it.

Apparently he left trudged slowly off the field with a hanging head.

correction made

Good knocks for Burns and Warner today. The rest of the innings was nothing to write home about.

Wow D/L certainly made it rough for Ireland. 180 of 24 overs seems an awful lot.

Great effort by Ireland to almost reach yet another ridiculous Duckface/Lurid target.

Ireland's run rate 6.7,Australia's 5.5, that's us too big a gap for D/L to be accurate.


Well done Ireland.

The Waugh Twins wrote:Ireland's run rate 6.7,Australia's 5.5, that's us too big a gap for D/L to be accurate.


Well done Ireland.

ireland did have 10 wickets to lose in just 24 overs and australia would have batted differently had they known it would only be a 40 over innings