Arthur Crabtree wrote:Gingerfinch wrote:I'd bring in Taylor and Hales, and drop Buttler and Bell for the last test. Bairstow can keep.
Good plan. Swanny is currently saying the same thing.
sussexpob wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Gingerfinch wrote:I'd bring in Taylor and Hales, and drop Buttler and Bell for the last test. Bairstow can keep.
Good plan. Swanny is currently saying the same thing.
Bairstow has as many 50's as Buttler in tests, but Buttler has played 7 less test matches. Buttler averages more and is a full time keeper.... Buttler is out of form, but Bairstow is hardly bang on fire, with 1 x 50 in 9 tests.......
Im struggling to see what swapping an inferior keeper is doing for the team, Im struggling to see how giving an additional responsibility to a person struggling in his main role lamely is going to be helped by this, and I am struggling to see how Bairstow stays in the team in any role.
Gingerfinch wrote: Bairstow is a better bat than Buttler. Whether he's a better keeper is another question, which I don't know the answer to.
sussexpob wrote:Gingerfinch wrote: Bairstow is a better bat than Buttler. Whether he's a better keeper is another question, which I don't know the answer to.
Bairstow has a lower 50 rate per innings, lower runs per innings, lower average per wicket.
Bairstow can smash around trundlers in front of 10 blokes on deck chairs reading papers, but so far in test cricket he has been outclassed.
Arthur Crabtree wrote: That feels like dogma. The fact he's an all rounder doesn't matter. Should Kallis not have batted in the top six? Or the young Steve Waugh? He's there because he's rated a top six bat. Not because England only need five batters. There's a case for dropping him, but not because he can bowl.

hopeforthebest wrote:A bit of time wasting from the England batsmen would a good idea.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests