Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

by **budgetmeansbudget** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:26 pm

Some people saying if we had taken the tenth wicket the d/l target would have been much easier?

Interesting that NZ were 125-2 at about the 26 over stage.

by **captaincolly** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:29 pm

budgetmeansbudget wrote:Some people saying if we had taken the tenth wicket the d/l target would have been much easier?

Interesting that NZ were 125-2 at about the 26 over stage.

I think so, not bowling them out plus the big finish to the innings.

by **ianp1970** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:29 pm

Making_Splinters wrote:New Zealand score at under 6, England have to go at over 7. No wonder D/L has such a bad name.

For half the overs with 10 wickets to lose...

I know which side of the equation I'd rather be on

by **ianp1970** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:31 pm

We'd fancy this in a T20 at the minute!

by **braveneutral** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:33 pm

Good catch!

by **budgetmeansbudget** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:38 pm

Roy needs to do something here, he's considered to have had a good series with the way the rest of the top order has played, but I don't think he's up to this level yet, hope he proves me wrong.

by **ianp1970** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:45 pm

budgetmeansbudget wrote:Roy needs to do something here, he's considered to have had a good series with the way the rest of the top order has played, but I don't think he's up to this level yet, hope he proves me wrong.

Think Moeen will be back in the next series.

by **budgetmeansbudget** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:52 pm

This is going well, looks like England are going to lose the two d/l affected games unless someone can come to the party.

by **captaincolly** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:01 pm

Dreadful batting- do they think they need 292 not 192?

by **Arthur Crabtree** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:01 pm

Seems a fair equation to me. If anything, England have the better of it. A slightly below average ODI score has been converted into an average T20 score, plus six extra overs, BUT, with ten wickets. Great.

They only need seven an over.

by **SaintPowelly** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:01 pm

Why are England batting like morons ??

Its only 7.5 an over, not 15

by **backfootpunch** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:05 pm

they seem to think they have to get this in 16 overs not 26

utterly brainless from morgan and stokes

by **SaintPowelly** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:06 pm

backfootpunch wrote:they seem to think they have to get this in 16 overs not 26

utterly brainless from morgan and stokes

And Root.

by **captaincolly** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:08 pm

SaintPowelly wrote:
backfootpunch wrote:they seem to think they have to get this in 16 overs not 26

utterly brainless from morgan and stokes

And Root.

And now Hales.

by **SaintPowelly** » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:08 pm

Mathieson will bowler better deliveries than that, and get hit for 6.

Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

ODI Series & T20i, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Re: ODI Series, England v New Zealand, 2015.

Who is online