Arthur Crabtree wrote:Mohali, like the old ground at Nagpur, was developed to be a faster track, with layers of bricks laid below the surface to give some bounce. I don't think it ever worked. I saw the game at Mohali in 2001 and mainly watched Harbhajan and Kumble bowl England out in a heavy defeat. Bangar, Siddiqui and Yohannan made debuts for India, Dawson and Foster for England. And there wasn't any bounce. Dawson took the most wickets for England.
Myth because of the WI first test at the ground and then because of the Ranji games at the ground especially when BCCI started doing pitch initiatives of grounds being more pacey or Seam friendly grounds in the north were then very fast bowling friendly or seam friendly and it mostly been the case since then but never been the case in international games.
when you have the likes Siddarth Kaul, sandeep Sharma who is very good with the seam and swing it both ways and a very talented pace bowler the pitches will always be made to suit your strengths.
plus punjab IPL games tend to be seam friendly and pace friendly to take into account its pace and fast bowling strength especially with mohali and Dharamasala being produced to suit them.
you really need to be careful with comparing ranji trophy games and Test matches especially with Ranji games having a lot of grass and lot of water at some grounds they are literally so bowling friendly teams bowl first.
IE what my evidence showing earlier.
Why do you think Pace men do so well in ranji games and top bowling and wicket taking tables.
in 2012, 13, 14 period most of the top 10 wicket takers were pace men because apart from a few South rank turners all games were played on Seaming decks, pacy decks or very flat batting decks and spinner just never had the skill to take wickets on those wickets.