Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

Posted: **Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:23 pm**

backfootpunch wrote:
rich1uk wrote:fairly sedate from SA so far today and abdv extremely lucky not to be out lbw first ball

It looked very out and should have been given

Pollock claimed the umpire had made the correct call because it was umpires call but that was smashing middle stump out of the ground

If it had been a quick bowler then fair enough but elliot was never gonna get the ball to bounce over the stumps at that pace

as you say it looked out in real time and was the most marginal of marginal umpire's call decisions

Posted: **Wed Aug 26, 2015 3:47 pm**

NZ chasing 284

Posted: **Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:01 pm**

dale steyn really doesn't suit that moustache

Posted: **Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:03 pm**

or the long hair..

Posted: **Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:30 pm**

Under 300 doesn't suggest a very progressive brand of cricket from South Africa.

Posted: **Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:53 pm**

Arthur Crabtree wrote:Under 300 doesn't suggest a very progressive brand of cricket from South Africa.

Someone must have forgot to tell them you have to slog from ball one and can't play yourself in anymore as anything below 375 and you lose

Posted: **Wed Aug 26, 2015 5:25 pm**

50 for Latham

Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

NZ tour of Zim and SA, Aug 2-26

Re: NZ tour of Zim and SA, Aug 2-26

Re: NZ tour of Zim and SA, Aug 2-26

Re: NZ tour of Zim and SA, Aug 2-26

Re: NZ tour of Zim and SA, Aug 2-26

Re: NZ tour of Zim and SA, Aug 2-26

Re: NZ tour of Zim and SA, Aug 2-26

Re: NZ tour of Zim and SA, Aug 2-26