Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:03 pmSA have to take a risk here and bring the field up to stop the singles, too easy to just drop and run atm
Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion
A friendly community forum for discussion about cricket - and other topics of interest! :)
http://cricket-match-special.com/
ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Page 11 of 16
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:03 pmRe: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:05 pmnot sure that was the time for that shot with it being easy to do it in singles
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:09 pm3 needed off the last over
will be a super-over if its a tie
will be a super-over if its a tie
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:12 pmHas there ever been a super over in a 50 over match before?
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:12 pm8th wicket down
still 2 needed from the last 4 balls
still 2 needed from the last 4 balls
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:14 pmphew Shrubsole gets it thru the field for a 4 and the win
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 9:50 pmSouth Africa ran us close today. Credit to them.
Wolvardt is some player.
Wolvardt is some player.
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:03 pmNever in doubt? 
Well done England. Now go on and win it. You're definitely capable of doing so, but need to master those nerves.
Jenny Gunn. Can't believe she wasn't picked at the start, but she's really taken the opportunity, had a fantastic tournament.
Dane van Niekerk has been one of the top bowlers of the tournament, still tops the wicket charts, but didn't take a wicket against England in either game.
In another odd stat, while England have four batters in the tournament's top 10, including the leading run-getter, they don't have any bowlers in the top 10 wicket takers or best economy rates - you have to go down to 14 for top wicket takers. While Australia have three in the top 10. In some ways amazing that England have won seven on the bounce without a single bowler taking 9 or more wickets - I guess it shows the bowlers are really a unit, and they're winning on the strength of their batting.
Well done England. Now go on and win it. You're definitely capable of doing so, but need to master those nerves.
Jenny Gunn. Can't believe she wasn't picked at the start, but she's really taken the opportunity, had a fantastic tournament.Dane van Niekerk has been one of the top bowlers of the tournament, still tops the wicket charts, but didn't take a wicket against England in either game.
In another odd stat, while England have four batters in the tournament's top 10, including the leading run-getter, they don't have any bowlers in the top 10 wicket takers or best economy rates - you have to go down to 14 for top wicket takers. While Australia have three in the top 10. In some ways amazing that England have won seven on the bounce without a single bowler taking 9 or more wickets - I guess it shows the bowlers are really a unit, and they're winning on the strength of their batting.
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:50 ammight be a delayed start for the second semi today but hopefully will be clear to get a full game in
wonder why there was a days gap between the 2 semis
wonder why there was a days gap between the 2 semis
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 4:18 pmKaur!
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 4:41 pmThis is incredible!
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 4:45 pmdan08 wrote:This is incredible!
with the golf and the cycling on i haven't really been watching it, last i saw was when they were 102-3 after 26 overs and i thought they were struggling
they have scored at more than 10 per over for the final 16 overs
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 4:48 pmthey end up scoring 179 off the last 16
what an innings from Kaur
she scored 131 off 56 balls in those last 16 overs
what an innings from Kaur
she scored 131 off 56 balls in those last 16 overs
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:31 pmNever been happy to lose money than today what a knock.
Re: ICC Women's World Cup 2017
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:52 pmI assume that everyone realises that India will win this comp because their players know that if they win they will become overnight multi-millionaires, while England will already subconsciously expect to have to settle for waiting another 30 or 40 years for global tournament success
written in the stars, I reckon
written in the stars, I reckon