Arthur Crabtree wrote:Where Anderson isn't dangerous in terms of wicket taking, he will still offer control. The main reason why his record in terms of average has improved so much recently is because he is so economical. He's become a throwback in that respect in the present era of fast strike rates and high runs per over. But if he isn't taking the wickets someone has to play that role. I thought he was over valued in UAE last time. He had a nice average because he gave so few runs away, but the SR was poor. In the context of the team, in spite of the average, he actually wasn't offering much. Maybe England just failed a bit slower.
Some truth in that . The big difference in Anderson at home (where he is deadly) and less helpful conditions overseas is that he won't take 6/35 in , say , Adelaide . But what he will do is get a vital early break (Rogers was a big factor in generally keeping him out on the last tour) and maintain tight control
to the advantage of those bowling with him. in 2010/11 Tremlett and Bresnan were excellent foils (not to forget Swann !) and the combination worked Australia over nicely. On the last tour , apart from Broad , there was no one else applying any pressure.
Key for England this year will be to get the combination right.