KipperJohn wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Wasn't expecting too much from the top three. Game on now.
Sounds like all 3 were fairly predictable dismissals which is disappointing.
Dr Cricket wrote:Australia waste both reviews, really shouldn't have risked the root one, the malan one was understandable though.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Still wouldn't put our chances much above 5%.
Been here so many times before to know we very rarely prosper.
Adi wrote:Handscomb is very much a back foot batsman. Even his bat lift is far too high. However he is scoring runs. I think bowlers will look to get him onto the front foot, especially bowling the out-cutter. I am also keen to see him face a left arm pacer over the wicket. Maybe he will still score runs, but I think he will be more troubles by lefties bowling full over the wicket and moving away from him.
mikesiva wrote:Adi wrote:Handscomb is very much a back foot batsman. Even his bat lift is far too high. However he is scoring runs. I think bowlers will look to get him onto the front foot, especially bowling the out-cutter. I am also keen to see him face a left arm pacer over the wicket. Maybe he will still score runs, but I think he will be more troubles by lefties bowling full over the wicket and moving away from him.
Hisdeficiencies have been well and truly exposed in this test.
mikesiva wrote:Adi wrote:Handscomb is very much a back foot batsman. Even his bat lift is far too high. However he is scoring runs. I think bowlers will look to get him onto the front foot, especially bowling the out-cutter. I am also keen to see him face a left arm pacer over the wicket. Maybe he will still score runs, but I think he will be more troubles by lefties bowling full over the wicket and moving away from him.
Hisdeficiencies have been well and truly exposed in this test.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests