mikesiva wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Sounds like Vince got a snorting delivery this time, instead of giving his wicket away.
It was a fantastic delivery from Starc!
That will be on the highlights for many a year.
mikesiva wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Sounds like Vince got a snorting delivery this time, instead of giving his wicket away.
It was a fantastic delivery from Starc!
from_the_stands wrote:We need about two more hours of play to wrap this up, I feel. The forecast is for more rain. Another 6 for 35 would do just nicely. The urn is coming home, bit I'll be honest, I want a white wash. A whitewash in the Ashes is such a beautiful thing. It helps to ease the pain of the 2005 defeat, the scars from which may never fully heal.
GarlicJam wrote:Yesterday, or the day before, Michael Clarke was on air, talking about the WACA's cracks in the pitch.
He stated along the lines of: throughout my career, I have never seen the cracks cause a batsman's loss of wicket. The IDEA of what the cracks may do, yes, but no wickets have fallen directly attributable to the cracks.
You go and have a quiet word to James Vince, Clarkie, see what he has to say.
mikesiva wrote:Is there a case for Cummins to be promoted up the order to replace starc at eight?
yuppie wrote:mikesiva wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Sounds like Vince got a snorting delivery this time, instead of giving his wicket away.
It was a fantastic delivery from Starc!
That will be on the highlights for many a year.
KipperJohn wrote:yuppie wrote:mikesiva wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Sounds like Vince got a snorting delivery this time, instead of giving his wicket away.
It was a fantastic delivery from Starc!
That will be on the highlights for many a year.
From what I’ve read it was going down the leg side then hit a crack. If that was deliberate by the bowler then, fair enough, it’s indeed a fantastic delivery; if not then it was just pure luck.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:I think the crack not being a factor in making batting harder but gets into the mind of the batter is just accepted/received wisdom. Of course if it hits the crack it will misbehave. Perhaps it just happens infrequently.
yuppie wrote:mikesiva wrote:Is there a case for Cummins to be promoted up the order to replace starc at eight?
From the evidence in this series, i would think so.
Adi wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:I think the crack not being a factor in making batting harder but gets into the mind of the batter is just accepted/received wisdom. Of course if it hits the crack it will misbehave. Perhaps it just happens infrequently.
Cracks definitely make batting difficult. It is proved in lot of matches (Wankhede, Nagpur, Mohali , Kotla from Indian wickets itself) . Kumble got 10 wickets at Kotla, most because of crack resulting in the ball taking abnormal paths and very inconsistent bounce from the same crack spot. Nayan Mongia had to wear the helmet and he got hit few times while keeping !! On day 5 in India, the cracks gets spinners those extra wickets.
Kotla wicket is a prime example of how cracks can make batting very tough. It has been under scrutiny in few tests. In 2013 the match versus Aussies ended in 3 days. Cracks started to develop on day 1 and Aussies lost lot of wickets on the day 1 (some due to cracks impact) . Some balls were staying too low and some bounced too high.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests