Arthur Crabtree wrote:No Mitch Johnson.
rich1uk wrote:not even sure what to think about this
http://www.news.com.au/sport/cricket/nine-managing-director-jeffrey-browne-claims-network-will-influence-team-selection-as-part-of-new-deal-with-cricket-australia/story-fndpt0dy-1226666430117
"Cricket has a long-standing and successful relationship with the Nine Network but team selections and scheduling are matters for Cricket Australia," he said in a statement.
"The National Selection Panel selects the Australian teams.
"With the volume of international cricket being played, it will continue to be necessary for us to manage player workloads appropriately."
hopeforthebest wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:No Mitch Johnson.
Mitch is remaining in the UK to take legal action against his barber.
rich1uk wrote:what the ch9 guy is saying is that they will have a say on when the big name players gets rested as it affects their ratings if they play a less than full strength team
CA obviously denied it
alfie wrote:rich1uk wrote:what the ch9 guy is saying is that they will have a say on when the big name players gets rested as it affects their ratings if they play a less than full strength team
CA obviously denied it
Nine have tried this on before. Obviously they don't like the big guns missing games , but there isn't much they can do about it...they have already signed up to pay twice the national debt for the rights. Not likely to go on strike and not show a match , are they
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests