by shankycricket » Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:41 pm
Maybe take Woakes as backup batter cum allrounder if Taylor isn't convincing enough. I have Compton opening with Root at 6 in my first choice XI. Wishful thinking, I know.
I think at least one of Woakes or Stokes has to be in the squad to give that allrounder option. I won't start with 5 bowlers but if Swann gets injured and they have to play Monty/Tredwell/Kerrigan as the spinner, doing so in a 4 man attack is fraught with danger IMO. 5 bowlers (i.e. 4 seamers and 1 spinner) would be the better option in that case. The other left field choice (which obviously won't happen and probably quite rightly so) would be to take a spinning allrounder (Rashid or Borthwick) as cover for Swann and play him alongside 4 specialist spinners if Swann is injured. Won't happen of course and rightly so. The former sounds a better plan IMO.
Even if Swann plays, 5 bowlers is still of course worth considering on surfaces such as Adelaide.
Regarding Woakes vs Stokes, I'd like to find space for both in the squad but they won't take 18, so maybe take Woakes ahead of Taylor/Ballance as the backup batter. I don't think it'd be a terrible move. If I have to pick one, I'll go with Stokes as I believe as he is a better bowler (or to put it in another way, at least more likely to pick wickets at Test level). Woakes IMO is the better batsman, techincally and I think he has the potential to score Test hundreds. Quite ironic as they are supposed to be exactly the opposite at county level but from whatever I've seen of them, I think England are right in their assessment of Stokes as a bowling allrounder and Woakes as a batting allrounder. I'd pick both in the squad but if it comes down to only one of them, I think I'll plump for Stokes, being the better bowler IMO.
Cricket Quiz Season 1 Winner
"If Australia avoid playing big teams at Chennai and Delhi, we have a great chance to win the World T20. Only missing trophy from the cabinet" Shanky Dundee, on twitter.