Dr Robert wrote:I've gone
Fraser
Gough
Caddick
Anderson
Filntoff, Hoggard, Harmy, and Broad could have all got in tbh. Not much between them.
Gough and Caddick were an excellent pairing, who, especially caddick could destroy batting line-ups. Fraser got in through his nagging accuracy.
Like I said, the four below are just as good.
Broad
Hoggard
Flintoff
Harmisson
hopeforthebest wrote:[
The 2005 ashes quartet will do for me : Jones in place of Broad.
DiligentDefence wrote:As a quartet I've gone for Anderson, Flintoff, Fraser and Gough.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:[
The 2005 ashes quartet will do for me : Jones in place of Broad.
I was thinking that way. At least I picked Jones and Freddie. I'd love to have Harmi, but it's true, excellent though he was, he took most wickets against WI&NZ. Having picked these two, who shone briefly but brightly, I carried on in that spirit with Dean Headley. And completed the attack with the incredibly underrated Angus Fraser. I think they all complement each other.
hopeforthebest wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:[
The 2005 ashes quartet will do for me : Jones in place of Broad.
I was thinking that way. At least I picked Jones and Freddie. I'd love to have Harmi, but it's true, excellent though he was, he took most wickets against WI&NZ. Having picked these two, who shone briefly but brightly, I carried on in that spirit with Dean Headley. And completed the attack with the incredibly underrated Angus Fraser. I think they all complement each other.
I don't remember any pace attack that has gelled in the same way as those four did in 2005, that for me is the clincher. Others maybe better bowlers but a balanced attack is a rare thing.
Alviro Patterson wrote:Gough, Sidebottom, Hoggard, Bresnan
Return to Cricket Opinion Polls
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests