Page 1 of 1
Woakes or Stokes?
Posted:
Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:25 pmby andy
Clearly the selectors can't decide between Chris Woakes and Ben Stokes for the england side, in all formats, and most likely there can only be one in the side...who would you guys have Stokes or Woakes?...
I personally would have Stokes..
Re: Woakes or Stokes?
Posted:
Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:26 pmby dan08
I'll go with Woakes at the moment. More consistent with bat and ball.
Stokes is a bit hit and miss (mainly miss).
Re: Woakes or Stokes?
Posted:
Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:36 pmby Arthur Crabtree
Both.
Re: Woakes or Stokes?
Posted:
Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:03 amby from_the_stands
Who are these clowns?
Re: Woakes or Stokes?
Posted:
Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:50 amby Aidan11
Split the difference and pick Foakes.
Re: Woakes or Stokes?
Posted:
Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:44 amby shankycricket
Stokes clearly the better bowler at Test level. Won't have either in limited overs cricket but if forced to pick one, probably Woakes as he seems to be improving bowling at the death.
Re: Woakes or Stokes?
Posted:
Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:50 pmby captaincolly
Aidan11 wrote:Split the difference and pick Foakes.
I'm biased but think Stokes is the better long term bet, inconsistent right now but more likely imo to succeed with bat and ball against top class opposition.
Re: Woakes or Stokes?
Posted:
Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:02 pmby andy
captaincolly wrote:Aidan11 wrote:Split the difference and pick Foakes.
I'm biased but think Stokes is the better long term bet,
inconsistent right now but more likely imo to succeed with bat and ball against top class opposition.
couldn't agree more!