Arthur Crabtree wrote:Giving the bowlers something in 50 overs feels better for the game. But in 20 overs? I thought it was expected that there is nothing for the bowlers.
dan08 wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Giving the bowlers something in 50 overs feels better for the game. But in 20 overs? I thought it was expected that there is nothing for the bowlers.
This World T20 was more of a bowlers tournament.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:The idea of a balance between bat and ball is an old Test match paradigm, because the format needs it, otherwise you get a tension free stalemate. That's not definitely true in T20. It doesn't have to be balanced. It can be a test of who can hit the most balls over the rope.
Return to Cricket Opinion Polls
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests