Re: Poll: Stokes or Woakes
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:24 pm
There's no reason why both can't play. Just like they already have been.
A friendly community forum for discussion about cricket - and other topics of interest! :)
http://cricket-match-special.com/
Aidan11 wrote:There's no reason why both can't play. Just like they already have been.
braveneutral wrote:FTS does some lovely posts about the future composition of the Aus side from time to time.
From an England perspective I daren't look too far into the future but I think that the side will be as follows next summer:
1. Cook.
2. Plus one.
3. Root.
4. Plus two.
5. Ballance.
6. Bairstow.
7. Stokes.
8. Woakes.
9. Rashid.
10. Broad.
11. Anderson.
I sense that Ballance has staying power.
Hales potentially too but I see Vince being cast off.
Probably the only side with batting depth that would allow you to take out a front line batter and get another bowler in which would be scary for the opposition.
braveneutral wrote:Ali could be the front line bowler.
sussexpob wrote:Probably means both are terrible though...
Aidan11 wrote:braveneutral wrote:Ali could be the front line bowler.
That's about as likely as Sam Allardyce becoming England football manager.
Oh wait...