Re: Is Mitchell Marsh's time up?
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:53 pm
How about Paine? 4 Tests 35.87.
Cummins back and taking wickets
Cummins back and taking wickets
A friendly community forum for discussion about cricket - and other topics of interest! :)
http://cricket-match-special.com/
dan08 wrote:Faulkner's batting surely can't be any worse than Marsh's.
dan08 wrote:Faulkner's batting surely can't be any worse than Marsh's.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Marsh doesn't look like a top six bat. But he looks a bit more than a fifth bowler. If Australia had a convincing batter keeper, maybe Mitch3 would be easier to indulge. Perhaps the same is true of Faulkner too, who could conceivably bat at seven, but not six.