cricketfan90 wrote:im glad he's back...done his time, and therefore i'd give him a 2nd chance...whether he can get back to the same standard, remains to be seen..
cricketfan90 wrote:he admitted he had been guilty, he done the time that was asked of him..is it his fault it was cut short no.....im happy to see him back
Albondiga wrote:I do not condone his actions in any way but can understand the temptation for a young man who is using his cricketing talents to free himself of poverty I have seen bowling of various types and abilities over a period of more than sixty years and apart from Warne and Murali I had not seen a bowler with more natural talent. I wonder if his talent is still there.
clubcricketeradi wrote:Albondiga wrote:I do not condone his actions in any way but can understand the temptation for a young man who is using his cricketing talents to free himself of poverty I have seen bowling of various types and abilities over a period of more than sixty years and apart from Warne and Murali I had not seen a bowler with more natural talent. I wonder if his talent is still there.
Possessing talent should not make the cricketers eligible to do illegal things. imo every cricketer has talent, but the difference is dedication, practice, temperament etc which separates talented from the games great. Amir has in his little career shown that he does not has the temperament to become a games great. His mind is cluttered and corrupt. it is proven. Does every cricketer be allowed to do ilegal things because they all are talented. Morever, should games greats be allowed to fix matches, because they have actually proven their talent more than the lesser successful players. Neither should poverty be an excuse. There are many who might be more poor than Amir, so should they be allowed to fix matches as well because they are more poor.
Making_Splinters wrote:clubcricketeradi wrote:Albondiga wrote:I do not condone his actions in any way but can understand the temptation for a young man who is using his cricketing talents to free himself of poverty I have seen bowling of various types and abilities over a period of more than sixty years and apart from Warne and Murali I had not seen a bowler with more natural talent. I wonder if his talent is still there.
Possessing talent should not make the cricketers eligible to do illegal things. imo every cricketer has talent, but the difference is dedication, practice, temperament etc which separates talented from the games great. Amir has in his little career shown that he does not has the temperament to become a games great. His mind is cluttered and corrupt. it is proven. Does every cricketer be allowed to do ilegal things because they all are talented. Morever, should games greats be allowed to fix matches, because they have actually proven their talent more than the lesser successful players. Neither should poverty be an excuse. There are many who might be more poor than Amir, so should they be allowed to fix matches as well because they are more poor.
Amir admitted his guilt and has served his time. I don't see why he shouldn't be allowed back into the game.
Butt and Asif on the other hand are a different kettle of fish.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests