yorker_129-7 wrote:He's not Don Bradman and he never will be. But he bats at Number 11, what do you expect? He's always been better at hanging around than playing shots, his innings in Cardiff being proof.
Glenn McGrath was a shocking fielder and batsman as well, by the logic in here he wouldn't get a game for England and was an awful cricketer.
The problem Monty has is that he is not the best player in his discipline available for England so of course his other attributes will be brought up. As Grey put it earlier he is not a world beater so it is tough to get away with not being a respectable batsman or fielder whereas McGrath who is one of the greatest pace bowlers of the modern era was an instant pick.
A more realistic comparision would be Jimmy who is an automatic pick these days regardless of the fact he is not the best batsman among the bowlers we have on offer.



