Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

by **yuppie** » Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:04 am

dan08 wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Mr.Cricket wrote:Senanayake back to bowling in Srlankan Domestic.Interesting. So he chucked intentionally. How well he can perform with new action?Lets see.

This does seem strange as SL have not released the amount of flex Senanayake bowls at after his remedial action work. They are letting him bowl to practice his new action, but are not stating that its legal

The worry I have is what happens if he is passed fit to bowl at the world cup, but starts to chuck again? If he gets called at the WC he can still bowl for another 20 days, which could have a major impact on the WC. Would SL have beaten England in the one day series with out Senanayake chucking?

I think if you've been banned and come back then if you get reported again within the next year or 2, you're immediately banned again.

Is this true? If so again i could imagine it creating a huge up roar at the world cup. There is a chance he wont be chucking as well, but if he got called then he would not be able to bowl?

by **dan08** » Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:07 am

Pakistan have banned 16 players with suspect actions
http://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/65 ... ect-action

by **yuppie** » Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:58 am

dan08 wrote:Pakistan have banned 16 players with suspect actions
http://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/65 ... ect-action

Well this clamp down has to be a good thing. Though not for the players who have probably been encourage to bowl a certain way. Certainly unfair on them

by **braveneutral** » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:35 pm

He's on the warpath.

by **Durhamfootman** » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:51 pm

yuppie wrote:
dan08 wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Mr.Cricket wrote:Senanayake back to bowling in Srlankan Domestic.Interesting. So he chucked intentionally. How well he can perform with new action?Lets see.

This does seem strange as SL have not released the amount of flex Senanayake bowls at after his remedial action work. They are letting him bowl to practice his new action, but are not stating that its legal

The worry I have is what happens if he is passed fit to bowl at the world cup, but starts to chuck again? If he gets called at the WC he can still bowl for another 20 days, which could have a major impact on the WC. Would SL have beaten England in the one day series with out Senanayake chucking?

I think if you've been banned and come back then if you get reported again within the next year or 2, you're immediately banned again.

Is this true? If so again i could imagine it creating a huge up roar at the world cup. There is a chance he wont be chucking as well, but if he got called then he would not be able to bowl?

I suppose that there is always the risk that he gets 'called' on reputation even if his action then proves to be just legal

If elite umpires have been found to be incapable of calling someone with 40 odd degrees of flexion, then that suggests that they might not have a clue as who is, and who isn't, chucking

by **dan08** » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:54 pm

Hafeez has been reported in the CLT20.

by **hopeforthebest** » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:59 pm

dan08 wrote:Hafeez has been reported in the CLT20.

Not before time, he's been chucking every time I've seen him bowl.

by **Mr.Cricket** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:55 am

Subrayen reported too. He was already reported and cleared a year back.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/southafrica ... 02640.html

by **Arthur Crabtree** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:19 am

Hafeez can bowl in international cricket, but just not BCCI events!

by **yuppie** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:30 am

Arthur Crabtree wrote:Hafeez can bowl in international cricket, but just not BCCI events!

? how does this work then

by **Arthur Crabtree** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:41 am

I suppose he has to get reported playing for Pakistan to be stopped throwing for them. Should Pakistan bowl him under that circumstance though?

by **yuppie** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:25 am

Arthur Crabtree wrote:I suppose he has to get reported playing for Pakistan to be stopped throwing for them. Should Pakistan bowl him under that circumstance though?

You would think not. But then how can he be cleared to play if not reported by the ICC?

by **Arthur Crabtree** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:37 am

If the BCCI have called him, then presumably Hafeez can just avoid the Champions Trophy. Which would leave a tricky situation for him, the ICC and the PCB. Presumably, he's going to get called next time he bowls for Pakistan.

by **Mr.Cricket** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 1:13 pm

Dean jones calls for Narine's action to be tested.

by **yuppie** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 2:55 pm

Arthur Crabtree wrote:If the BCCI have called him, then presumably Hafeez can just avoid the Champions Trophy. Which would leave a tricky situation for him, the ICC and the PCB. Presumably, he's going to get called next time he bowls for Pakistan.

Have the BCCI tested him to see what angl he flexes at? Surely they just cant ban him, or am i missing something really simple here

Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Who is online