![hide :hide](./images/smilies/1197434330468d1046da139.gif)
Dilbert wrote:The selectors made that decision because they thought it was the best for English cricket. Hindsight has probably proved them wrong, but now it's easy to say thatI think you saw in Australia at the World Cup the dangers of making such a big decision so close to the tournament. I don't know what's gone on on that tour, but it did look like the lads were shell shocked from the first two games. That's when you need real leadership to help steer you through that. I would have loved to have had the opportunity that was taken away from me
This is what Captain Fantastic said. Unbelievable![]()
Aidan11 wrote:Iv'e just realised that last sentence could be mis-interpreted.
dan08 wrote:clubcricketeradi wrote:backfootpunch wrote:Alviro Patterson wrote:clubcricketeradi wrote:Bell 262 runs @ 52.40 @ SR 77.28
Joe 202 runs @ 40.40 @ SR 84.16
Moeen 192 runs @ 38.40 @ SR 105.49
Taylor 149 runs @ 37.25 @ SR 88.69
Jos 141 runs @ 35.35 @ SR 135.57
Bell is useless. There are much better run scoring batsman atm in England.Discuss.....
Two problems with Bell - struggled to time the ball and is slow running between the wickets, turning 2s into 1s and 3s into 2s.
the main problem with bell comes after the powerplay, first ten overs he is excellent, but when the sweepers go back his main boundary option (lofted cover drive) gets put away and he gets bogged down against the spinners/medium pacers
his inability to rotate the strike efficiently against the slow bowlers means he plays ambitious shots against the fast bowlers and gets himself out, it is why he has made so few hundreds
he was not the issue at the world cup though, that was ballance, morgan and taylor (bar the 90 odd against the aussies that didnt really matter since the game was already over)
not only did they not score any runs they swallowed up deliveries as well, though obviously taylor is fairly blameless since he was batting out of position
If someone is scoring 52 runs average then the SR of 77 is not that bad, although SR if in 80- 85 would make it look ideal. Also considering we are discussing team England wherein only few batters are scoring enough runs to make the SR worthy, Bells contributions become crucial in building totals. 52 @ SR 77 is a good contribution when i look at the relative performance of other batters of England team in this WC. He may get in bad patch next series, but here in WC he has been Englands highlight player. Now looking at Bell as option at next WC which the thread is about. He would be 36 at next WC which is no way a retirement age for a specialist batsman who does not bowls in both formats of the game. If he is form prior to series before WC, he should be in team. if he is out of form the way Morgan etc are, he should be dropped. Specialist batsmen under 40 should not be discarded for reasons such as age if they are fit, experienced and in form.
Compare Bell to other openers at the World Cup. They nearly all have a strike rate over 100.
D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
Aidan11 wrote:Shame about his past and present.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests