SaintPowelly wrote:Where is all this BS about him giving his all to international cricket coming from, he refuses to play county cricket.
shankybiggestengfan wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Where is all this BS about him giving his all to international cricket coming from, he refuses to play county cricket.
So what?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:If you don't care about international cricket, I can't see why you are bothered about this, Powelly. He hasn't committed a crime. What is at stake is the effectiveness of the ECB international management strategy, and the strength of the national team. KP barely plays CC.

D/L wrote:What happens in other countries or Pietersen’s playing record is neither here nor there.
SaintPowelly wrote:shankybiggestengfan wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Where is all this BS about him giving his all to international cricket coming from, he refuses to play county cricket.
So what?
That he has no reason to complain of tiredness.

shankybiggestengfan wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:shankybiggestengfan wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Where is all this BS about him giving his all to international cricket coming from, he refuses to play county cricket.
So what?
That he has no reason to complain of tiredness.
How does not playing CC amount to not giving his all to international cricket?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:If you don't care about international cricket, I can't see why you are bothered about this, Powelly. He hasn't committed a crime. What is at stake is the effectiveness of the ECB international management strategy, and the strength of the national team. KP barely plays CC.
SaintPowelly wrote:His only obligation is England, instead he chooses to play in India and tell England to *modded* off, how is that right.
shankybiggestengfan wrote:The simple fact is that a player should be allowed to pick and choose which formats he wishes to play in. I dont agree that he should be allowed to pick and choose his ODIs. However, if he decides to give up ODIs altogether but still play T20, then I dont see why that should not be allowed as T20 is a different format.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:His only obligation is England, instead he chooses to play in India and tell England to *modded* off, how is that right.
I don't think he was doing that. He was asking to miss some series. And then he asked to just play T20. And then he said he'd just play Tests. This reading seems unnecessarily partisan.
shankybiggestengfan wrote:The simple fact is that a player should be allowed to pick and choose which formats he wishes to play in. I dont agree that he should be allowed to pick and choose his ODIs. However, if he decides to give up ODIs altogether but still play T20, then I dont see why that should not be allowed as T20 is a different format.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests