KipperJohn wrote:KP and Cook would certainly, at the very least, be in contention for a best post war Engalnd side, as would Trott, Swann, Flintoff and Anderson.
Bell now has better stats than Vaughan and is approaching 100 Tests and 7,000 runs, with 20 hundreds - which is not to be sniffed at either.
BTW KP's Ashes series played in - won 4 lost 2 - same as Bell. Not many England players have that on their CV.
cricketfan90 wrote:KP - IMO a very good cricketer, but not a great
Making_Splinters wrote:KP would have to compete with the likes of Barrington, Dexter, Compton and Hutton for a spot in the side.
Cook might edge Boycs, but the mighty Amiss still reigns supreme.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Making_Splinters wrote:KP would have to compete with the likes of Barrington, Dexter, Compton and Hutton for a spot in the side.
Cook might edge Boycs, but the mighty Amiss still reigns supreme.
Going on figures, Dexter might struggle to get in. The others are definites. Possibly May? And Thorpe?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Smith was a hero... but he couldn't play spin very well.
Gower was great, but then he played against some woeful sides in the Packer era, and some weak Aussie teams, and didn't excel against the West Indies. And his attitude to the game wasn't great. Gooch was probably the great bat from that era.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests