The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

What's buzzing in the world of cricket....

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby Arthur Crabtree » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:57 pm

It's the team management's job to get the players to the ground in as good condition as possible to turn in the best performance they can. Comparison with heavy industry or playing conditions 50 years ago might be tongue in cheek, but they have no relevance to turing out a national side in this age.
I always say that everybody's right.
User avatar
Arthur Crabtree
 
Posts: 88334
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Nottingham
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire.

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby Peter Lanky » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:38 pm

Arthur Crabtree wrote:It's the team management's job to get the players to the ground in as good condition as possible to turn in the best performance they can. Comparison with heavy industry or playing conditions 50 years ago might be tongue in cheek, but they have no relevance to touring out a national side in this age.

On the contrary, I think they have every relevance and are certainly not tongue in cheek.

We are talking here of extremely fortunate people who have a lifestyle in terms of enjoying their 'work' and the payment for it that most people would give anything for. They may be fitter than players in the past and have a few more expectations, but in the end they are doing something they enjoy immensely, and can also look forward to some very easy money when they retire at a very early age. Any player moaning because they are a little tired is not going to impress most people.
Peter Lanky
 
Posts: 2302
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:50 pm

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby meninblue » Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:04 pm

Arthur Crabtree wrote:It's the team management's job to get the players to the ground in as good condition as possible to turn in the best performance they can.


Arthur, i feel that it is primarily the players responsibility to be fit. Board can only provide support staff, hi tech gym access, nutrition products, hygienic hotel rooms for stay on tours, luxury class travel. Then still if there are fitness issues or need of rest for a player putting his own enough efforts to stay fit, the board should take further steps of providing off tours / rests. if there is no prudent effort by the player to be fit for priority tournament then the board would not be as much concerned about that particular player.
Test FL's - 8 , ODI and Tests Combo FL's - 1, ODI World Cup - 1, ODI FL's - 7, ODI and T20i combo FL's - 1 ,
T20 Franchisee FL's - 7, T20i Cup FL's- 1, T20 FL's- 5 , 50 Overs Domestic FL's - 1, 40 Overs Domestic FL's- 1
User avatar
meninblue
 
Posts: 25955
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:36 am

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby Arthur Crabtree » Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:36 pm

OK Adi, fair enough.
I always say that everybody's right.
User avatar
Arthur Crabtree
 
Posts: 88334
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Nottingham
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire.

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby D/L » Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:58 pm

Peter Lanky wrote:
Arthur Crabtree wrote:It's the team management's job to get the players to the ground in as good condition as possible to turn in the best performance they can. Comparison with heavy industry or playing conditions 50 years ago might be tongue in cheek, but they have no relevance to touring out a national side in this age.

On the contrary, I think they have every relevance and are certainly not tongue in cheek.

We are talking here of extremely fortunate people who have a lifestyle in terms of enjoying their 'work' and the payment for it that most people would give anything for. They may be fitter than players in the past and have a few more expectations, but in the end they are doing something they enjoy immensely, and can also look forward to some very easy money when they retire at a very early age. Any player moaning because they are a little tired is not going to impress most people.

Good points, well made, PL. I'd add to that, that not only do today's top players have a less onerous workload, they also have a much better support infrastructure, enabling them to extend their careers until they think they have enough money to retire comfortably. Few players of yesteryear were ever able to reach that point. I know that was then and this is now, but Pietersen will probably find even less sympathy amongst people who take into account the rewards received by top cricketers than it seems he got from the ECB.
User avatar
D/L
 
Posts: 9154
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:08 pm
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire CCC, Wakefield Trinity RLFC, Leeds Carnegie RUFC.

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby ddb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:23 pm

@Isam84: Shakib has sent a letter to BCB asking for rest instead of playing Zim series... What do you think, should he get it or not? Give reasons...
Intent

IPL 2009 Prediction League Champion 2009-10 footy prediction guru Joint 2010 footy final placings guru 2010 Eng vs Bang combined prediction guru 2011 World Cup Fantasy
User avatar
ddb
 
Posts: 19376
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Kohlism

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby dan08 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:58 pm

ddb wrote:
@Isam84: Shakib has sent a letter to BCB asking for rest instead of playing Zim series... What do you think, should he get it or not? Give reasons...

He's been complaining about how tired he's been for ages which is why he pulled out of the Essex deal. Anyway, the Zimbabwe series isn't official, it's just a few friendlies.
2011 Sri Lanka v Australia ODI FL guru
2011 India v West Indies ODI FL guru
2012 Bangladesh Premier League T20 FL guru
2012 West Indies v New Zealand Test FL guru
2012 Sri Lanka Premier League T20 FL guru
2012 India v England Test FL guru
2014 Australian Open Tennis FL guru
2014 Australia v England T20 FL guru
2017 ICC Champions Trophy FL guru
User avatar
dan08
 
Posts: 19340
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 5:28 pm
Location: London
Team(s) Supported: England, Kent, Malaysia, Manchester United

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby shankycricket » Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:28 pm

OffStumpYorker wrote:
shankybiggestengfan wrote:
Iamthewalrus wrote:
shankybiggestengfan wrote:
Iamthewalrus wrote:So, you still believe that playing in the IPL has nothing to do with it?

It didnt stop Colly from being rested in 2010.
:?


Can't remember that?

I think the ECB made the decision and not Flower regarding KP. I may be wrong though???

I think so too but I think Flower could have tried to do something if he really wanted KP.


whose to say he didnt try and reach a comprimise with the ECB and KP, Flower is only the coach and can only make a suggestion. And FYI, as saint points out Colly was rested after medical advise due to a shoulder injury.

Its also possible that the contracts were worded differently in 2010 which allowed for players to have play T20i's and miss ODI's.

No, he isnt. He is the Director of English cricket. He has more powers than a normal coach.
Cricket Quiz Season 1 Winner

"If Australia avoid playing big teams at Chennai and Delhi, we have a great chance to win the World T20. Only missing trophy from the cabinet" Shanky Dundee, on twitter.
shankycricket
 
Posts: 14139
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:44 am
Location: Goa
Team(s) Supported: Australian Cricket and Rafael Nadal

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby meninblue » Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:43 am

I am wondering whether Andy Flower wants to show his authority or KP.
Test FL's - 8 , ODI and Tests Combo FL's - 1, ODI World Cup - 1, ODI FL's - 7, ODI and T20i combo FL's - 1 ,
T20 Franchisee FL's - 7, T20i Cup FL's- 1, T20 FL's- 5 , 50 Overs Domestic FL's - 1, 40 Overs Domestic FL's- 1
User avatar
meninblue
 
Posts: 25955
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:36 am

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby meninblue » Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:50 am

It will be interesting to see what effect his retirement will have on the team as far as team environments is concerned. Also, will the captain find it easy to gel the team well now? The comments that will follow from the ODI captain Cook will throw some light on the dressing room atmosphere.
Test FL's - 8 , ODI and Tests Combo FL's - 1, ODI World Cup - 1, ODI FL's - 7, ODI and T20i combo FL's - 1 ,
T20 Franchisee FL's - 7, T20i Cup FL's- 1, T20 FL's- 5 , 50 Overs Domestic FL's - 1, 40 Overs Domestic FL's- 1
User avatar
meninblue
 
Posts: 25955
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:36 am

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby OffStumpYorker » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:10 am

shankybiggestengfan wrote:No, he isnt. He is the Director of English cricket. He has more powers than a normal coach.


Shanky, most job titles dont mean a think now-adays, I went for a job that was basically a Technical lead position, yet the job title was Assistant Vice President of ?, yet had no power at all, even to the point of not being able to sign of subordinates holiday requests.

The director of Cricket is effectively Head coach, is responsible for the players on the field, and a member of the selection committee, at best he would act as a go between for the ECB and Players on issues with the ECB and Players as any head of department/director would initially do.

As I said we have absolutly no idea what role Flower played and whether he tried to reach a compromise between the ECB (the Employers) and KP (the Employee). Why do you think it took over a week to sort the issue out.

Probably timeline
Lords Test : KP speaks to Flower about giving up the ODI's and focusing on Tests and T20's
Lords Test : Flower arranges meeting with ECB to discuss matter
Interim Lords/TB : Flower meets ECB and disucsses matter and possible solutions.
Interim Lords/TB : Flower speaks to KP to give options, meeting arranged with ECB, KP and Flower
TB Test : KP, Flower and ECB meet to discuss options and ideas, no resolution
Post TB Test : KP, Flower and ECB decide on wording of retirement notification
Post TB Test : KP publically retires from ODI and T20i Cricket.

As this is what would happen in any organisation where there was a contractural dispute.
'To Beer or Not to Beer, that is the Question, whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The hangover and pains of outrageous lager'
User avatar
OffStumpYorker
 
Posts: 3955
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: London
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire CCC, England (naturally), Sheffield Wednesday (for my sins)

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby rich1uk » Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:01 am

personally i think the reason it took so long to sort it out was that there was a series of bluffs and counter-bluffs being made by both parties trying to force the other to back down. both parties being stubborn that didn't happen. and instead of any sort of compromise being reached we have ended up in the current situation.
"I know words, i have the best words" - Donald J Trump

2012 SA vs SL ODIs prediction guru 2012 Movie Cup
2012 CB series guru
2012 Music Cup
2012 WI vs Oz Tests prediction guru
rich1uk
 
Posts: 22062
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:03 pm

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby meninblue » Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:09 am

OffStumpYorker wrote:As this is what would happen in any organisation where there was a contractural dispute.


:thumb
Test FL's - 8 , ODI and Tests Combo FL's - 1, ODI World Cup - 1, ODI FL's - 7, ODI and T20i combo FL's - 1 ,
T20 Franchisee FL's - 7, T20i Cup FL's- 1, T20 FL's- 5 , 50 Overs Domestic FL's - 1, 40 Overs Domestic FL's- 1
User avatar
meninblue
 
Posts: 25955
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:36 am

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby Making_Splinters » Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:59 am

To be honest if the ECB are making this about the IPL then they are setting themselves up for a crash further down the line. So far they have been able to get away with their policy of basically ignoring that it exists for two reasons: Firstly as of yet English players who play across the formats have not been attractive prospects within the IPL with only a handfull of what is of our players who have tried to get contracts being sucessful and secondly through their spending power being able to mitigate the dollar pull of the IPL through central contracts.

These two factors might not last forever and teams like New Zealand and the WICB have shown that boards putting the foot down and being wrapped up in their own hubris does not work.
"It was my opinion it is up to me if I want to justify it or not" - Bhaveshgor
User avatar
Making_Splinters
 
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:44 pm
Location: Manchester, England
Team(s) Supported: Cricket - Lancshire , England
Rugby - Sale , England

Re: Kevin Pietersen retires from limited overs cricket

Postby OffStumpYorker » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:17 am

Making_Splinters wrote:To be honest if the ECB are making this about the IPL then they are setting themselves up for a crash further down the line. So far they have been able to get away with their policy of basically ignoring that it exists for two reasons: Firstly as of yet English players who play across the formats have not been attractive prospects within the IPL with only a handfull of what is of our players who have tried to get contracts being sucessful and secondly through their spending power being able to mitigate the dollar pull of the IPL through central contracts.

These two factors might not last forever and teams like New Zealand and the WICB have shown that boards putting the foot down and being wrapped up in their own hubris does not work.


M_S, I doubt it is about the IPL, but the argument is that if a player complains about a crowded schedule and wants a rest, and does so AFTER playing in the IPL knowing full well that they have a full International summer and winter schedule then really that Is not the ECB's problem, it is the players problem as they are the one that decided to play the Extra cricket and take the money, when they could have had thier feet up, as you point out the ECB has no control over the players playing in the IPL, except for requiring that all players int he IPL compensate thier club to the tune of 10% of thier contract (Pro-rated for a player on a multi year contract), and so far have bent over backwards to allow players to play in the IPL, unless a centrally contracted player is injured that is.

To me its no different to a person who doesnt take breaks from work then complains about being tired and stressed and not having time to have a rest.
'To Beer or Not to Beer, that is the Question, whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The hangover and pains of outrageous lager'
User avatar
OffStumpYorker
 
Posts: 3955
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: London
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire CCC, England (naturally), Sheffield Wednesday (for my sins)

PreviousNext

Return to International Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests