Arthur Crabtree wrote:Looking over the stats, Dean Jones, Javed Miandad, Zaheer Abass, Steyn, Hadlee and Curtly might have made it into the options.
Durhamfootman wrote:I saw this on the bbc website, and was immediately struck by its pointlessness
If only there was a team that had won 3 world cups on the trot, then they could have debated which of their 11 players were the best, instead of pratting about with a spurious mix and match
remind me how many times a 'World' XI featuring the best players from around the world, ever beat the best 'team' in the world
shankycricket wrote:Gilly - Avg 36 SR 97
Sehwag - Avg 35 SR 104
Considering that Gilly started off earlier than Sehwag and retired 5 years before him and didn't play much ODI cricket in the T20 era (Sehwag's best ODI performances came post 2008) and played majority of his cricket in conditions where the par ODI score is far lower than India, that IMO takes care of the SR difference (97 is hardly slouch anyway). Also, Sehwag never made much of an impact in World Cups unlike Gilly, surely that has to count for something too?
Dr Robert wrote:Changing the subject slightly.
Which 'team' is the best ever? Impossible to answer, I know.
The Aussie 2007 team went through unbeaten, or maybe the 79 windies team?
sussexpob wrote:Dr Robert wrote:Changing the subject slightly.
Which 'team' is the best ever? Impossible to answer, I know.
The Aussie 2007 team went through unbeaten, or maybe the 79 windies team?
India 2010 to 2011 were my best team, simply because their batting line up was like the cricket equivalent of the death star.....
The Waugh Twins wrote:Wow just off the top of my head I see there is no Symonds, Dean Jones or Hayden.
The Waugh Twins wrote:Wow just off the top of my head I see there is no Symonds, Dean Jones or Hayden.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest