Arthur Crabtree wrote:In the last two years I've lost a bit of faith in the impartiality of the UK press. I can't read the regular columnists and reporters in the Guardian (I rely more on below the line commentators), and get a queasy feeling as I follow a link to the Telegraph, Mail, Independent etc. I'd say Cricinfo offers a better independent voice on English cricket now and I'm far more likely to read their articles.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:In the last two years I've lost a bit of faith in the impartiality of the UK press. I can't read the regular columnists and reporters in the Guardian (I rely more on below the line commentators), and get a queasy feeling as I follow a link to the Telegraph, Mail, Independent etc. I'd say Cricinfo offers a better independent voice on English cricket now and I'm far more likely to read their articles.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:I think it's more a case that the UK press prefers not to upset the ECB in order that it receives their off the record press briefings. It seems that during the Anderson case, the BCCI has been manipulating the press in a similar way, so I wouldn't be surprised if the same thing isn't happening in their press- though I'm happy to be corrected.
D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 113 guests