bigfluffylemon wrote:Cricinfo confirming Ed Smith as well. I really have no idea if he'd be any good. Time will tell I guess.
I might have liked to see them try Vaughan - I tend to like his analysis in the press/TMS - he seems well in tune with what's needed. But I think he rubs some people up the wrong way.
Vaughan would, or least I hope he would, be force to give up his ISM role. There's a bit of a conflict of interests - sceptics would point out that Vince is a client...