bhaveshgor wrote:lol if you picked the 11 best player in Statistic england would pick a very bad team and probably pick players that not even international standard
sussexpob wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:lol if you picked the 11 best player in Statistic england would pick a very bad team and probably pick players that not even international standard
Most runs in the county championship this year...
Ashwell Prince.... successful international
KP.... Englands most successful international and most runs for England in the last series they played
Adam Voges..... averages 45 in ODI cricket, and I think has the largest average of any player playing more than 5 T20 internationals.
Alex Hales.... was tipped by many to debut in this test until the IPL came knocking
Michael Carberry..... played one full series for England, outperformed Root, Cook et al by being the second highest run scorer.
James Hildreth.... possibly the unluckiest player in England never to get capped...12000 runs at 44 in a career is highly impressive.
Most wickets...
Shehzad.... Average of 28 in ODI cricket, and 15 in tests.....
Jarvis.... test average of 30, on par with Broad and Anderson, playing in an attack as being the only person capable
Rushworth.... stand out county perfomer, has 5 4-fors in 7 county games.
Harris.... has a good record for the England Lions and is highly regarded.
Not sure this is a list of poor cricketers
sussexpob wrote:I dont really understand the point of this "well you cant guarantee a player with good stats is international standard"
How can you guarantee someone worse is going to make it then? Its not rocket science really, if one player is returning more facing the same opposition, then how can you equate that one has the characteristics to succeed when the other doesnt?
Surely, the more likely scenario is the person who has a technique and quality to perform against lesser mortals, while thrive better against others? If Stokes can only score 33 per innings against county attacks, then how is to say these weaknesses disappear when faced with Dale Steyn?
Its a false economy
Arthur Crabtree wrote:sussexpob wrote:I dont really understand the point of this "well you cant guarantee a player with good stats is international standard"
How can you guarantee someone worse is going to make it then? Its not rocket science really, if one player is returning more facing the same opposition, then how can you equate that one has the characteristics to succeed when the other doesnt?
Surely, the more likely scenario is the person who has a technique and quality to perform against lesser mortals, while thrive better against others? If Stokes can only score 33 per innings against county attacks, then how is to say these weaknesses disappear when faced with Dale Steyn?
Its a false economy
It does happen though.
sussexpob wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:lol if you picked the 11 best player in Statistic england would pick a very bad team and probably pick players that not even international standard
Most runs in the county championship this year...
Ashwell Prince.... successful international
KP.... Englands most successful international and most runs for England in the last series they played
Adam Voges..... averages 45 in ODI cricket, and I think has the largest average of any player playing more than 5 T20 internationals.
Alex Hales.... was tipped by many to debut in this test until the IPL came knocking
Michael Carberry..... played one full series for England, outperformed Root, Cook et al by being the second highest run scorer.
James Hildreth.... possibly the unluckiest player in England never to get capped...12000 runs at 44 in a career is highly impressive.
Most wickets...
Shehzad.... Average of 28 in ODI cricket, and 15 in tests.....
Jarvis.... test average of 30, on par with Broad and Anderson, playing in an attack as being the only person capable
Rushworth.... stand out county perfomer, has 5 4-fors in 7 county games.
Harris.... has a good record for the England Lions and is highly regarded.
Not sure this is a list of poor cricketers
sussexpob wrote:I mean Rushworth is a good example. So he is fat, not quick, not going to reverse swing it.... but he is getting batsman out every week, for cheaper than anyone else.
If these guys who bowl 99mph and reverse swing it are better than them, then why arent they taking wickets like him? If Stokes is better than Taylor, then why isnt he scoring runs like him every week?
sussexpob wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:sussexpob wrote:I dont really understand the point of this "well you cant guarantee a player with good stats is international standard"
How can you guarantee someone worse is going to make it then? Its not rocket science really, if one player is returning more facing the same opposition, then how can you equate that one has the characteristics to succeed when the other doesnt?
Surely, the more likely scenario is the person who has a technique and quality to perform against lesser mortals, while thrive better against others? If Stokes can only score 33 per innings against county attacks, then how is to say these weaknesses disappear when faced with Dale Steyn?
Its a false economy
It does happen though.
To get to this players, you have to go through a long list of messy casualties.... the overall net effect is that its a total lottery to pick a guy who hasnt established himself to a good level before test cricket, I would probably hazard a complete guess that 5% of those picks take off.
Is this a worthwhile policy then? Considering those "success" examples I can think of dont include a single world class player
Be good if you can name players that can actually play for England since Voges/Prince/KP/Jarvis won't exactly play for england or can even play for england right now.
What do you do if a different kind of bowler does well in SA, Aus, India, etc?
Or if 70-80 mph bowlers do worse in international cricket if given the chance?
Simon Jones wasn't a successful fc bowler. Were Freddie and Harmi?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:sussexpob wrote:I mean Rushworth is a good example. So he is fat, not quick, not going to reverse swing it.... but he is getting batsman out every week, for cheaper than anyone else.
If these guys who bowl 99mph and reverse swing it are better than them, then why arent they taking wickets like him? If Stokes is better than Taylor, then why isnt he scoring runs like him every week?
What do you do if a different kind of bowler does well in SA, Aus, India, etc?
Or if 70-80 mph bowlers do worse in international cricket if given the chance?
Simon Jones wasn't a successful fc bowler. Were Freddie and Harmi?
There probably isn't an absolute way of doing it. But it might be that just picking a county heavy hitter (Hick) isn't always going to trump the hunch (Vaughan). But again, I generally agree with your point.
D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 126 guests