by sussexpob » Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:31 am
The documentary is devoid of any of the details, it sticks pretty much to central tenant of what must be sacrificed to be the worlds best; but at the same time, misses entirely the point about the true cost of that success. So we get Prior talking about the team celebrating a good test, only for Flower to punish them for having a beer by turning their hangover day in the hotel into an army camp assault course, but we are supposed to take away from it that those reminders of "the job isnt done till its done" is what makes champions, and not the arguable reality that treating people in such a way destroys them over anything but the shortest of time spans.
Its not hard how to see how some people just dont respond to that, and some people may do. I get the feeling with Prior that he was someone who looked at sporting success in a similar way to Flower, and when told to pointlessly run up sand dunes till he dropped, seen the greater good; others would seen this madness for what it is. I get the feeling its a clash of personalities when we look at Prior v KP, and neither is right. Good managers of people can adapt their message to understand that some people need different approaches to get the best out of them. Flower has no clue about that, I get the feeling you end with a few core players that maybe bought into him that ended as his favourite players, and those he couldnt manage were forced to the perimeters as trouble makers.
For every Prior that gets better, there is a Finn thats reduced to cry, or Trott reduced to a mental mess, or a KP. Interesting that Prior says for instance Ian Bell was dying in that SA punishment exercise..... and we wonder why he got to 30 around a time he should have peaked, and his form died a death and effectively had to retire at 32 in an era where his career record stood out miles over those replacing him.
There is no assessment of the damage this approach caused, and no critique of whether it was worth it, so the whole is rendered pretty invalid. It concludes that the method was worth it, and that the damage was just part of what is required to make it. But England were briefly number one for a few days, but then fell like a deck of cards.
Lets be honest, India had one of the best batting line ups ever that was in fierce decline and with retirements looming, and had just lost their two key spinners; Australia were a team completely in rebuild. It wasnt an era where becoming number 1 required an epic team, there was no truly world class team about. England just happened to be in the stage of development that was more advanced. We got good wins away in these places, but Flowers side would have never beaten Australia in 2006/07, or never have beat India away 5 years before.
So England momentarily settled team had 1 or 2 years where they did very well, but that was it. The cost of beating a few average sides destroyed the fabric of the national game, and didnt lead to a boom; the fallout turned people away and left them disinterested. Was it worth a token World Number 1 tag for a few weeks to then get embarrassed in OZ next time, or get embarrassed in UAE, or lose at home in May to a Sri Lanka team with 4 bowlers who wouldnt get a game in a Div 2 side in the CC?
Flower built a castle in the sand
2010 French Open fantasy league guru 2010 Wimbledon fantasy league guru 2014 Masters golf fantasy guru 2015 Players Championship FL Guru 2016 Masters Golf Fantasy Guru
And a hat and bra to you too, my good sirs!