Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

Posted: **Sat May 09, 2015 5:34 pm**

shankycricket wrote:It happens in the IPL on a far greater scale. Based on what I've read on Twitter there are at least 6-7 dodgy instances this year.

TBH be careful most of these people are most likely gamblers that lost money because their traded wrong or backed the wrong team.

the only dodgy part of IPL I find is the Shitty Indian players, the one and two players in each team that are more likely to be fixing or doing anything dodgy.
Doubt any International or indian national player would fix now since their are risking a ban and not playing international cricket.

Posted: **Sat May 09, 2015 10:41 pm**

I'm not accusing anyone of anything. Its just that I can't really trust the product anymore. Not my cup of tea. Sorry.

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 1:53 am**

http://www1.skysports.com/watch/video/s ... ny-studios
Isha Guha interviews people on the Sony coverages and they basically said IPL is entertainment and the studio show is 60% entertainment and 40% Cricket.

in their own words it is a cricketentaintainment show.

TBH don't really see what is wrong with that considering all country board treat the format as a entertainment and bringing new crowds into the game.

Posted: **Fri May 15, 2015 4:47 am**

Yesterday, Narine for the first time in this IPL, seemed confident while bowling that knuckle ball and knocked over Rohit. Rohit made it feel as if it was the ball of the century by playing inside the line. But good signs for Narine.

Posted: **Wed Jun 03, 2015 8:51 am**

Sri Lankan cricket authorities have answered the question - with an unequivocal YES!

http://www.cricket.com.au/news/sri-lanka-suspect-bowling-actions-crackdown-170-bowlers-128-suspended/2015-06-03

Bold move. It took some guts. But this is something that was entirely predictable all through the Murali controversy.

Posted: **Tue Jul 14, 2015 7:45 am**

Kevin cooper called in the CPL....

Posted: **Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:02 pm**

Mohammed Hafeez banned from bowling for 12 months

Posted: **Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:03 pm**

Just about to post about that.

Posted: **Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:56 pm**

I'd have probably got around to posting it but at a more leisurely time to suit myself.

Posted: **Fri Jul 17, 2015 7:40 pm**

My thought process was that I had 12 months to do it.

Posted: **Mon Nov 09, 2015 10:31 am**

"Sunil Narine, the West Indies offspinner, has been reported for bowling with a suspect action during the third ODI against Sri Lanka in Pallekele. Narine finished with figures of 0 for 24 in the Pallekele ODI, which Sri Lanka won by 19 runs based on the Duckworth-Lewis method. The match officials' report, handed to the West Indies team management after the game, cited concerns about the legality of Narine's deliveries. Narine will need to undergo testing on his action within 14 days, and will be permitted to continue bowling until the results of his testing are known. This is the first time Narine has been reported in an international game, though he has undergone scrutiny of his action during the IPL and the Champions League T20. He was reported twice in two matches during the 2014 edition of the CLT20, forcing him to miss Kolkata Knight Riders' final against Chennai Super Kings."

http://www.espncricinfo.com/sri-lanka-v ... 38671.html

Posted: **Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:44 pm**

No shock there.

Posted: **Mon Nov 09, 2015 6:43 pm**

Arthur Crabtree wrote:No shock there.

surprise it took him too long to have an official test/ call in international cricket.

Narine must be over the limit by a huge amount before for him to take a long break.

Posted: **Sun Nov 29, 2015 3:07 pm**

Narine suspended....

http://www.espncricinfo.com/westindies/ ... 45381.html

Posted: **Sun Nov 29, 2015 4:05 pm**

Narine gets tested and is found to be beyond the 15 degree limit on every one of his deliveries. Given what has gone before the only shocking thing here is how he was even bowling in the first place!

Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.

Re: Does he throw or not throw, that is the question.