Page 70 of 70
Re: Kevin Pietersen's Autobiography.
Posted:
Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:58 pmby Arthur Crabtree
OK, maybe there could be some commentary on the book...
Re: Kevin Pietersen's Autobiography.
Posted:
Mon Nov 02, 2015 8:01 pmby Gingerfinch
Noy just having a go at KP here, but how can 'celebrities' have two-three autobiographies come out within a couple of years of each other?
It could read as before, but have since given up on the ECB.
Re: Kevin Pietersen's Autobiography.
Posted:
Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:57 pmby Making_Splinters
Well having played against Warne and Murali, it wouldn't be obtuse to suggest Swann isn't the best thing since sliced bread.
Another sad page in the what could have been category.
Re: Kevin Pietersen's Autobiography.
Posted:
Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:20 pmby Aidan11
Re: Kevin Pietersen's Autobiography.
Posted:
Fri Nov 06, 2015 6:39 pmby Alviro Patterson
KipperJohn wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:KP's got a new autobiog out!
He's had two lives? Most of us only get one.
KP is jesus christ in disguise
Re: Kevin Pietersen's Autobiography.
Posted:
Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:32 pmby Aidan11
Alviro Patterson wrote:KipperJohn wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:KP's got a new autobiog out!
He's had two lives? Most of us only get one.
KP is jesus christ in disguise
Or a resident of Albert Square.
Re: Kevin Pietersen's Autobiography.
Posted:
Sat Nov 07, 2015 11:25 pmby Durhamfootman
seems like a cheap shot, to me
the kind of thing that people who have no talent do to people who do. the kind of thing usually spouted by american hairdressers who contribute to programmes like biggest celebrity fashion fails on 'E'
still... I'm sure that KP feels 'cut to the quick' by this chap's rapier like wit and will feel thoroughly diminished by the author's brilliance
or perhaps not
Re: Kevin Pietersen's Autobiography.
Posted:
Sat Nov 07, 2015 11:37 pmby Arthur Crabtree
The Digested Read is pretty much the same every week. That style turned on to a new target He did one on the first KP book. Howveer, as the Guardian's cricket writers all have the same view of KP, this article pretty much follows editorial policy. The paper is slavishly pro-establishment as far as cricket goes.
