by sussexpob » Thu Jun 04, 2015 11:38 am
While the cricketing back pages of the last month have been dominated by the tales of “trust issues” and one man’s quest to find cricketing redemption for his past transgressions, not a single word has been dedicated to a story of equal, if not more poignant, narrative that has been silently playing out in parallel.
The setting is Pakistan, and a 22 year old bowler is preparing to bowl his first ball in a T20 domestic tournament. He looks nervous, surveying the field, takes a deep breath, and begins his run up. The ball fires down the leg side and is called a wide. Many 22 year olds have been here before, embarking on a professional career, a ball of nervous energy trying to control their emotions; but this is no ordinary 22 year old, and his next ball beats the bat with looping swing, condemning the batsman to the embarrassment of a long walk back to the pavilion having registered a duck. As with Kevin Pietersen, there was never any doubt about Mohammed Amir’s talents.
There are unquestioned parallels in the stories of both men, and the journey’s they now face. Pietersen’s rap sheet reads like a letter sent home to the parent of a naughty 8 year old school child. He talked in class, whistled in silent time, got caught passing a note around to classmates calling his teacher and other pupils nasty names. They were a matter of triviality, only given serious form when magnified by the pride or prejudices of others. At this point though, the similarities end.
It could be argued that Amir’s transgressions are of an equal trivial nature. His crime, taken from the most simplistic of angles, was to benefit his teams opponents with two extra runs in a match that ended with the opposition winning by an innings and 225 runs. If actions were judged on their actual effect, then it is doubtful that a suitable punishment would even extend to the magnitude of a smack on the bum and being sent to bed without dinner.
Yet, on that faithful day at the Oval in 2010, Amir’s did not only physically “step over the line”. In putting his foot purposefully 6 inches over the bowling crease, he stepped into the dirty underworld of sports, dragging with him his country, his team mates, and all those neutral observers who put their faith, interest and time in the uncomplicated nature of competitive sport. Sport in itself only serves as entertainment under the pretext that those involved are trying their hardest. When the competitive element is compromised, so too is all achievements, and our appreciation of the skills worse off. To serve as an example, Trott and Broad’s innings that match will be forever tarnished, even if Amir ended up performing to the highest expected level on a personal basis.
I would never argue that Mohammed Amir did not need to be punished for his actions that day, would never attempt to defend those actions. What he did was deserving of a suitable punishment, one that was extremely harsh. Like Pandora’s box, Butt, Asif and Amir all contributed to bring poignant questions about the integrity of their sport. As a cricket lover, forgiveness could not occur without suffering as a price.
I am, though, a great believer in the concept of redemption, and a great believer that punishments only serve to mean anything, or have practical relevance to humanity, if forgiveness for actions is a possibility to anyone. What is the point in any level of society if, in real terms, a punishment extends to indefinitely, or is undefined?
It cannot be forgotten that for his actions, Amir was punished, and very harshly. He had his freedom temporarily removed, was incarcerated in a foreign jail, and was banned from playing in the sport he loves for 5 years. And while it is often argued that sports stars are undeserving of the privilege of stardom and the financial benefits it brings if they break social, criminal or sporting codes, I do not see any justification for singling out a sportsman for this. After all, sportsman have to sacrifice a lot of time, effort, sweat and tears to be as good as they are, it is not handed to them on a plate. In Amir’s case, he has to work harder than anyone to make a second attempt at his career. I cannot see any reason why, if his punishment is served, his extra hard work should not be rewarded?
There are other parts to this story, mitigating factors, ones that I will leave others to read Mike Atherton’s take on (google Mike Atherton Amir and you will find his long, forensic assessment of the details of the story), but it is suffice to say that Amir’s story seems to add up, that he was a victim of undue influence from a captain exploiting his young age, and his gullibility in accepting the wrong type of friends and influences. The ICC seemed to accept his guilt and remorse also, allowing him to continue his career before his 5 years had completely been spent due to his work with their anti-corruption unit.
We often forget that sports stars are fallible, and few stars burn so bright and so early as Amir’s, and test a young man's maturity as much. There are countless examples of younger stars, in all forms of industries (music/film) that cannot handle the pressure, the success, the attention. Comparisons to Tendulkar and his age are often mentioned, that Tendulkar was even younger, was under more pressure. But Tendulkar’s castle was built on the rocks, he was mentored by the right people, had the right influences…. Amir was mentored by a corrupt captain, with corrupt players around him, and a team in institutional crisis of rotating captains being sacked or quitting, of a desperate board, and of players coming from a more troubled culture at home. His castle was built on quicksand, a toxic mix for such a vulnerable age of playing struggling to find a role model. If we cannot extend forgiveness to such a vulnerable and impressionable young man for his mistakes, then I think this reflects badly on society as a whole.
Do I feel let down by Amir’s actions? I would be lying if I was to say no I wasn’t, but the reason my emotional attachment to this case is marked is because I witnessed in 2010 a talent that I had never seen before. A talent that comes round in such rare occasions that you stand up, take notice. I feel let down because Amir let himself down, because his actions may prevent him from eeking out every little bit of his absolutely endless potential. That inside the 11 men on the field were people there to destroy him, when 15,000 people around the field were there to celebrate his talents, regardless of their national identity having his skills bridge the tribalistic nature of patriotic support. I hasten to think that many cricket watchers felt exactly like Michael Holding did when he fought back tears in the sky booth, quite obviously upset that “someone has got to him" and that "he did not do this on his own”.
Mohammed Amir let down his sport, but his skills are also the reason why I turn up to watch sport at the top level and why I spend so much time watching it. Without guys like Amir, sport would not be the same. I think we need to let him continue his career now, at test level if he can get back there.
2010 French Open fantasy league guru 2010 Wimbledon fantasy league guru 2014 Masters golf fantasy guru 2015 Players Championship FL Guru 2016 Masters Golf Fantasy Guru
And a hat and bra to you too, my good sirs!