clubcricketeradi wrote:Alviro Patterson wrote:clubcricketeradi wrote:Guess selectors dropped for that match losing last over.Or was it the bad economy rate and SR accompanied with lack of as many wickets as expected form a specialist bowler Two consecutive T20 series whitewash would have looked bad and selectors faith in Chris was rewarded well.However, i would not be surprised to see Bresnan making a comeback as Broad might be unfit.There is hardly anything to choose Jade over Bresnan.
Chris: 4 overs, 39 runs, 3 wickets @ 9.75 rpo, SR 8
Bresnan: 7.5 overs 87 runs , 2 wickets @ 11.10 rpo , SR 23.5
Post injury, selectors have dropped Bresnan twice in test format. Once in ODI and once in T20's. Such things can be good as some of the dropped cricketers comeback strongly.
Chris Jordan's final two overs went for 15 and 14 runs, which suggests he is no better bowling at the death than Tim Bresnan or Jade Dernbach.
As far as overall career is concerned, Chris in no way can be compared to Bresnan at this point of time.Chris only merits a selection ahead of Bresnan on form basis, not experience.
The SR of 8 and SR of 23.5 is a huge difference although the re is hardly any significant difference in economy rates of Chris and Bresnan.
I won't be surprised if selectors recall Bresnan by dropping Jade. But i can't see him making a comeback by replacing Chris.So many out of form England players.Add to the fact that the spinners are struggling to pick enough wickets.Thinktank cannot afford to rest couple of players who are in form.If they dare to rest in form players then things can only get worse.
A bowling strike rate of 8 based upon 4 overs in a single match.
On that basis, Jordan should replace Lumb at the top of the order for his close to 300 batting strike rate.