Arthur Crabtree wrote:Are we not going to look beyond Tim now though Alfie. I doubt JD will survive the competition. But Tim has done as badly...
clubcricketeradi wrote:...The only positive about Bresnan is his batting.He has made impressive contributions with the bat. But he has bowled worse than part timer and his bad fielding form has been as worse as that of any other players bad fielding form...
D/L wrote:clubcricketeradi wrote:...The only positive about Bresnan is his batting.He has made impressive contributions with the bat. But he has bowled worse than part timer and his bad fielding form has been as worse as that of any other players bad fielding form...
I wonder if it is some personal agenda against Bresnan or just a profound ignorance of cricket that would give rise to the repetition, ad nauseam, of such clearly ridiculous comments.
My money's on both.
clubcricketeradi wrote:Good to see that some posts have been removed for the purpose of moderation and action.Not surprised about the posts though accusing me of personal agenda when there is none, laughing about my grammar, terming my cricket knowledge as ignorance and ridiculous etc because that's what i was expecting.I hope the moderation is timely so that i do not have to reply to the unwanted content directed to me in a way that i have so far restrained from replying.Can someone sort out the above post as well with unnecessary content directed to me.
England's_No7 wrote:Technically what Adi said is correct. Quite a few part timers in this tournament have a considerably better economy than 10.75. His fielding in this tournament wouldn't look out of place in a Bangladesh side. Obviously in general Bresnan bowls better than part timers and is a reasonably good fielder but even you, D/L, have to admit that Bresnan performed well below what he was expected to. Not the only one of course but you have to have to acknowledge that he was very poor. Even players i like such as Tredwell i'll admit was very disappointing, there's no point blindly defending a player no matter how much you like him...
Aidan11 wrote:There are some posts on here that are completely unacceptable.
Please stop using personal insults/attacks and get this thread back on to a more civil discussion or I'll have no option but to lock the thread.
England's_No7 wrote:Technically what Adi said is correct. Quite a few part timers in this tournament have a considerably better economy than 10.75. His fielding in this tournament wouldn't look out of place in a Bangladesh side. Obviously in general Bresnan bowls better than part timers and is a reasonably good fielder but even you, D/L, have to admit that Bresnan performed well below what he was expected to. Not the only one of course but you have to have to acknowledge that he was very poor. Even players i like such as Tredwell i'll admit was very disappointing, there's no point blindly defending a player no matter how much you like him...
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 121 guests