mikesiva wrote:Sorry, I don't buy that....
As far as I can see, every current member of the Saffer team deserved his place in the side. Right now, Prince and Duminy are going thru a rough patch, and it's very likely one of them will lose their spot. But there's no disputing that they earned their right to play in the side.
Prince failed to score a test 50 till his 10th test match..... and when he finally did, it was against a Zimbabwe XI that were days away from withdrawing themselves from competition due to their lack of competitiveness? If anything, Prince proves how much leeway a potentially good black player gets when compared to a good white player. The way he performed particularly in the second year of his career would have seen a white player ditched for eternity.... as i said in FC there was many players pushing a case, yet Prince was given ample opportunity.
Duminy is going through the same thing, no test 100 in 10 tests in the last 5 matches a top score of 36 and 3 0's...... now again Id argue that a player of white background would have been ditched by now!
So compare these players havent had anywhere near the time in the team to settle.... Van Jaarsveld, Kemp, Ackerman, Zander De Bruyn(how performed well, but was only given 3 tests!!).
Currently the team has players who are settled. De Villiers, Smith, Kallis, Boucher and Amla are not problems, yet the black players in the team are failing very badly and arent dropped.
And with Alvaro Pietersen being picked in the team for the test vs India, you also have to question the fairness in selection. People like Stephen Cook, Vaughan Van Jaarsveld, Dean Elgar, Smits, Roussow, Kunn... even Johan Botha had an amazingly year in Domestic cricket, and had the added option of being able to increase the bowling attack in India....
So its clearly apparent that black players are favoured over the whites where possible