Durhamfootman wrote:I think it demonstrates how vital he is to England's plans, that any suggestion of a minor niggle brings with it an immediate intervention
sussexpob wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:I think it demonstrates how vital he is to England's plans, that any suggestion of a minor niggle brings with it an immediate intervention
The intervention was not immediate. Fabrace has said that he apparently had discomfort in his ankle leaving the field on Day 3, and that after discussion with the ECB medical team, it was decided that he would be pulled from the game on Day 4, but that Sussex would be allowed to bowl him for one spell before he was retired for the game. He then sent down a mammoth 9 over spell at full pace with no signs of discomfort, was called to the dressing room, jogged off with no signs of problems, and didn't return.
I mean, call me dumb, but do you really expect me to believe that a player would be removed from a game due to an injury concern, but only after he bowled a mammoth 85 minute spell? Its funny, because when Sussex fans pointed out on social media that there was nothing apparently wrong with him, the club came out to say that he had no problems with running or bowling, but that the pain was uniquely while walking slowlyHe then leaves the ground with a full moon boot cast and crutches, only to miraculously recover at his apparent scan minutes later.
Not buying it.... why can they not just admit the ECB clearly must have said if Sussex don't take wickets in the morning, and the game result looks increasingly like a draw, then he's pulled so as not to further bowl on a doormat of a pitch?
Of course, its not the first time either.
Last year the ECB made us remove him from a squad on the basis he had toothache a week before, and they didnt believe he would be fit enough to bowl.
He then disappeared before a test match at Leicester, apparently because he had a stomach bug, but was wandering around the ground singing autographs all day
He takes 14 wickets, and they make us pull him out of the game the other wicket because of a mystery back problem that they claim was an issue before he took his best haul ever in cricket...
Not buying any of them.
Durhamfootman wrote:I'm feeling sorry for Gloucestershire atm. They'd already lost 800 overs in 4 matches to the weather, which is roughly 8 days and a session of play and now they go to Derby and guess what............. no play today because of rain
they just can't catch a break this season
Durhamfootman wrote:Notts are dead in the water. I have no idea why Warks kept batting on and on and on and then only declared after Notts had got all 3 bowling points. Why wouldn't you declare on 525-8?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests