captaincolly wrote:Clark run out for 92 going for what sounded like a risky single!
Durhamfootman wrote:you wait ages for a wicket to turn up and then two turn up in two balls![]()
83-2
Durhamfootman wrote:Hill gifts his wicket
I think Handscomb was caught off a Parky no ball. He's bowled a lot of them 4 by my count. If that didn't take the edge, then it would have been extravagant turn. I think it took the edge. Careless if it was. Handscomb can bat all day
140-3
captaincolly wrote:North and Campbell have got most things right in this new era - even the T20 defeats have usually been smallish margins- but I don't know why they didn't strengthen the seam bowling options. We knew Potts would be involved with England and Carse and Coughlin likely to ( at least) miss as many games as they play...and if Carse did stay fit for any length of time he would be on the England radar.
You could say it's unfortunate that all 3 are missing at the same time but not surprising. Need to have a couple of bowlers in reserve to fill the gap between the first choice ones and the rookies. I know Bedingham has been modest in T20 but it comes to something that we have to leave him out because of a thin bowling squad!
It's similar with the batting too - just as well there haven't been any injuries or drastic loss of form because there's no cover there either.
Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:North and Campbell have got most things right in this new era - even the T20 defeats have usually been smallish margins- but I don't know why they didn't strengthen the seam bowling options. We knew Potts would be involved with England and Carse and Coughlin likely to ( at least) miss as many games as they play...and if Carse did stay fit for any length of time he would be on the England radar.
You could say it's unfortunate that all 3 are missing at the same time but not surprising. Need to have a couple of bowlers in reserve to fill the gap between the first choice ones and the rookies. I know Bedingham has been modest in T20 but it comes to something that we have to leave him out because of a thin bowling squad!
It's similar with the batting too - just as well there haven't been any injuries or drastic loss of form because there's no cover there either.
well presumably the signings will take care of the batting next year. I still think Trev could be a red ball batter, then there's Bushnell and McKinney, with Bushy offering a 4th seamer option.
I thought Stan looked very good for 4 of his 5 overs. Just that last one that got a bit of tap
Durhamfootman wrote:we keep chipping away. Handscomb now gone for 50 runs more than I think he should have
Mulder in next. It would be very helpful if we didn't give him a life too
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests