st_brendy wrote:We just need to re-step on the gas a little bit. At risk of missing 180 - 200 otherwise.
captaincolly wrote:st_brendy wrote:We just need to re-step on the gas a little bit. At risk of missing 180 - 200 otherwise.
I don't want to put the mockers on but, despite Benks implying 180 would be merely par, could they chase anything like that given the pressure of a knock out game and their 100% loss record in T20 QF's.
They could do it but I'd be very surprised-although maybe I'm just thinking of Durham's dreadful attempts at chases over the years!
st_brendy wrote:captaincolly wrote:st_brendy wrote:We just need to re-step on the gas a little bit. At risk of missing 180 - 200 otherwise.
I don't want to put the mockers on but, despite Benks implying 180 would be merely par, could they chase anything like that given the pressure of a knock out game and their 100% loss record in T20 QF's.
They could do it but I'd be very surprised-although maybe I'm just thinking of Durham's dreadful attempts at chases over the years!
For me, chasing down anything over 170 would rely entirely on Moeen and/or Whiteley.
But both of them can do it, especially the latter.
st_brendy wrote:Hants v Lancs
A repeat of last year's SF. Hopefully we'll get revenge - just like we got revenge on Somerset in the 2012 SF, following our 2011 SF defeat to them.
Making_Splinters wrote:st_brendy wrote:Hants v Lancs
A repeat of last year's SF. Hopefully we'll get revenge - just like we got revenge on Somerset in the 2012 SF, following our 2011 SF defeat to them.
A lot will depend on if we've got Buttler for Finals day. Our batting is a lot weaker with out him.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests