westoelad wrote: Not so sure either whether tapping should be stopped-it's known as head-hunting in any other profession and is a commonly accepted practise.
Don't really see how this can be enforced to be honest. What constitutes "tapping up"?
The Professor wrote:Moeen' resigned for Worcestershire
westoelad wrote:Cricketers are paid for the skills they have to offer to the organisation who employ them and whether they represent the whole talent of the organisation, which perhaps the scouting, coaching , marketing and ground staff might question, they nevertheless surely have the same rights as any other employee to have the freedom of movement in their profession. Its pretty obvious that it's the increasing influence of agents that has caused this increase in poaching so it's how best to deal with this new situation. A rigid compensation system needs to be put in place which both the PCA and counties are in agreement with.
sussexpob wrote:westoelad wrote:Cricketers are paid for the skills they have to offer to the organisation who employ them and whether they represent the whole talent of the organisation, which perhaps the scouting, coaching , marketing and ground staff might question, they nevertheless surely have the same rights as any other employee to have the freedom of movement in their profession. Its pretty obvious that it's the increasing influence of agents that has caused this increase in poaching so it's how best to deal with this new situation. A rigid compensation system needs to be put in place which both the PCA and counties are in agreement with.
This post contradicts itself. Free movement of employees subject to compensation is not free movement at all.
You seem to be argue two points. If a player is an asset, then they should be treated differently. If they arent an asset and therefore treated as normal employees, then they should move freely, but also be bought?
sussexpob wrote:The Professor wrote:Moeen' resigned for Worcestershire
Arent you an English teacher ( I think)....
Do you not understand the importance of a hyphen in the above statement.
Re-signed or resigned are two different things
sussexpob wrote:The Professor wrote:Moeen' resigned for Worcestershire
Arent you an English teacher ( I think)....
Do you not understand the importance of a hyphen in the above statement.
Re-signed or resigned are two different things
Adi wrote:https://www.google.co.in/amp/m.indiatoday.in/lite/story/india-today-sting-operation-cricket-scandal-pune-curator-pandurang-salgaonkar/1/1074728.html
India Today sting: Pune curator Pandurang Salgaonkar puts pitch on sale hours before India-New Zealand 2nd ODI
westoelad wrote: Its pretty obvious that it's the increasing influence of agents that has caused this increase in poaching so it's how best to deal with this new situation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests