westoelad wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:The ECB has argued that the payment it made to Glamorgan was not compensation but a payment that allowed the Welsh county to come to an agreement with a creditor to reduce some of the debt they owe at a lower settlement.
That sounds rather like a bail out to me.... thank goodness there are no precedents for such an eventuality
Dobell asking some awkward questions again! FTECB must love Wor Geordie.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/ ... -went-awry
"Let's be clear: Yorkshire are a terrific club. There is no fault of them implied or presumed. But most reasonable observers will acknowledge it is remarkable how almost every major decision made in English cricket over Graves' period in office has benefited them. And they may acknowledge, too, at least the possibility of the perception of a conflict of interest there. And while that is the case, the governance of the ECB has to be open to serious questions."
If Yorkshire have benefited from ECB decisions, then Jonny Bairstow would have played in the 2016 County Championship finale and Yorkshire would not have been subject losing Quater-Final home advantage in last years T20 Blast campaign, an ECB decision made mid-way through the competition when Yorkshire were firmly in the top two.
Both these decisions damaged the competitive element of cricket and Graves could have intervened there and then, but he didn't. Goes to show Dobell has an agenda and would discredit Yorkshire's recent international match and city franchise awards because Graves was once a chairman and his family are major creditors.