Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

The Cricket Society produce a table for overall performance in all 3 formats with the CC carrying 50% more weighting than the 2 limited overs competition. Results for 2015 are:
1 Yorkshire 98pts
2 Notts. 98pts
3 Hants. 92pts
4 Warwicks 88pts
5 Durham. 85pts
6 Lancs. 83pts
7 Surrey. 74pts
8 Gloucs. 71pts
9 Essex. 71pts
10N'hants. 70pts
11Md'lsex. 68pts
12Worcs. 62pts
13S'merset61pts
14Sussex. 61pts
15Kent. 59pts
16Gl'gon. 40pts
17Derby. 20pts
18Leics. 17pts

Tie-breaker is overall results between the 2 teams

Surprised Yorkshire are top of the tree after a shambolic Twenty20 campaign, albeit the squad kept constantly changing due to international call up's.

Durham quite high as well despite mediocre CC & RL 50 season and a dire T20 campaign. Suppose the 50% CC weighting is the reason as we did win a fair amount of games...in the first half at least!

captaincolly wrote:Durham quite high as well despite mediocre CC & RL 50 season and a dire T20 campaign. Suppose the 50% CC weighting is the reason as we did win a fair amount of games...in the first half at least!

Given the comparative size of our squad and our wage bill that's one hell of an achievement.

Alviro Patterson wrote:Surprised Yorkshire are top of the tree after a shambolic Twenty20 campaign, albeit the squad kept constantly changing due to international call up's.

Not really as the successful T20 sides all had pretty shambolic CC campaigns e.g. Lancs,quite rightly,were only rated 10 th in the CC.

Lancs were 11th surely. They didn't win Div 2.

ThereIsNoRun wrote:Lancs were 11th surely. They didn't win Div 2.

Yeh they did implode at the end of season.

I'll take third. Punching above our weight in overall terms it seems.