wearside willow wrote:For whats its worth this is my views on recent events regarding the first team squad.
The club are spot on in sticking to their original contract offer to Onions, if he gets a better offer elsewhere or leaves because he is upset with Durhams offer then fair enough and good luck to him. If he stays which is unlikely then champion.
With regards to Jennings its similar to Rocky and Badger if he thinks he is better off at another county whether it be for money or England prospects then he should go. The club agreed to the get out clause so they knew it was a possibility.
Coughlin injury problems aside is a very handy county cricketer and the type of 3 dimensional all rounder all counties love to have. No doubt Notts will be paying him well and can probably afford the risk but Iam happy it is a risk Durham have ended up not making.
The 3 lads who have signed new contracts Burnham is a no brainer although he has had a slow summer. Poynter probably got one as he is probably cheaper than signing another reserve wicket keeper and his one day batting is ok. Pringle is a lucky lad, probably down to the decision to release Hickey and there is nobody else with his expierience.But I still see no real improvement in his batting or bowling since he broke into the side. Although I would imagine he is excellent around the dressing room.
Releasing Arshad is fair enough a number of younger players have moved ahead of him and I think he would only have been retained as a cheap option tho bolster the squad numbers.
Hickey is very unlucky and I actually think over all it is a very harsh decision by the club. As Captain says there is no doubt that there has been issues with his attitude and discipline, but the simple fact is at the time of his injury he was playing for the first team and had been given a key role in the T20 team ahead of others. It maybe that they believe Trevaskis who is a very similar style of cricketer is a better long term bet, but for me he deserved to be retained.
I agree with pretty much all of that. Hickey is unfortunate to be let go before having a proper chance to prove his worth and Pringle has not shown any sign of being someone who will either score runs or bowl well on a regular basis.
The only thing in my mind with Onions is if he goes can we use the money freed up to bring in someone close to his calibre? There'd be a risk in giving him the deal he wants but I just have a feeling it might be more of a risk to let him go. There's certainly a big problem though because I got the distinct impression at the members forum a few weeks ago that Lewis was not happy with Onions complaining in the press about not being offered a deal - and since then Bunny has been even more outspoken. I think westoelad's suggestion of a one year rolling type contract is the best solution but Onions seems stuck in his ways - if he doesn't get what he wants I think he might come to regret leaving.
I'm not sure we've learned a lot from this season - Steel has been superb and a huge positive , Clark has been very good and proven me wrong , Potts looks like a real prospect but the dreaded injury to him leads us onto that group of young bowlers who are in the same position now as they were a year ago - plenty of potential but seemingly unable to stay fit for any length of time.
As for the senior players - apart from Colly and Latham none of them have enhanced their reputations. Jennings has been hopeless after the first few weeks, Richo faded away after a good start, Onions looked more like his old self recently but has hardly played before that and Rushy is still a good bowler but the evidence for him being past his best is becoming hard to deny.
Assuming Jennings goes and Latham is back I think we need to bring in another top 3 batter of proven ability and a bowler with the same reputation. Much easier said than done and that's why I agree with westoelad about probably having to look at the Kolpak market for at least one player.