Page 81 of 84
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:12 pmby haggishants
I blame the BBC Live Reporting thread at 16:06....
16:06
Vince stoic in defence
Warwickshire 188 & 186 v Hampshire 116 & 124-5
England's potential number three in the Ashes is doing a very good job of dragging Hampshire closer to Division One safety.
James Vince, who earned a recall to the England side yesterday, is currently 30 off 123 balls.
23 overs left to survive for the visitors at Edgbaston.
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:13 pmby budgetmeansbudget
Only 20 odd overs left, Berg and Abbott are decent bats and Crane and Edwards can hang around.
Plenty of hope yet.
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:22 pmby Hampshireboi
19 to go...
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:23 pmby budgetmeansbudget
Berg doesn't know any other way!
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:24 pmby st_brendy
haggishants wrote:I blame the BBC Live Reporting thread at 16:06....
16:06
Vince stoic in defence
Warwickshire 188 & 186 v Hampshire 116 & 124-5
England's potential number three in the Ashes is doing a very good job of dragging Hampshire closer to Division One safety.
James Vince, who earned a recall to the England side yesterday, is currently 30 off 123 balls.
23 overs left to survive for the visitors at Edgbaston.
I don't know what the live feed is a bit later on, in relation to him supposedly getting out to an expansive drive. He played inside the line, and I'm not at all convinced he even hit it.
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:26 pmby haggishants
Only match out on the park now with Div 2 all done and dusted. Worcs and Notts promoted.
If nothing else, this match has made an enthralling end to the season.
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:33 pmby haggishants
How come we've got to 4:30 and they're saying 17 overs to go?
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:37 pmby Hampshireboi
I make it 16 overs to go, but the commentators are saying 15???
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:41 pmby st_brendy
haggishants wrote:How come we've got to 4:30 and they're saying 17 overs to go?
Yeah I think it is an over less. At 4.30, Warks has bowled 71 overs. (Actually, I think they had a ball or two of that 71st over left, but that's irrelevant)
17 would have the scheduled remaining overs to bowl the full 88, but I think Warks have lost one (effectively for not bowling quick enough during the day). I think.
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:45 pmby haggishants
16:45 Crficinfo and Kevan James agree that it's 14 overs from here.
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:49 pmby Hampshireboi
Berg not going to go down blocking is he. Giving me some heart problems
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:55 pmby budgetmeansbudget
An over ago cricinfo said 9.3 overs remaining, now it's saying 11.3!
Must have adjusted late for the last hour.
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:57 pmby st_brendy
At last, a proper LBW decision goes our way!
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:58 pmby haggishants
16:55 BBC , Cricinfo and Kevan James all say 11 to go.
Re: Hampshire 2017 thread
Posted:
Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:59 pmby Hampshireboi
It's up to 88 overs in our second innings